Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 DNA is not like a computer
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26020 Posts

Posted - 09/10/2014 :  21:25:42  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
DNA is Not Like a Computer:
Any model of DNA that attempts to talk about the whole of DNA, but doesn’t include even a couple of these affects is just not going to work. Honestly, I wish that ID proponents would step up. Information technology is a growing field in biochemistry. It’s being used by several scientists to explore DNA. Not by ID proponents, which is odd, but other scientists.
Fun stuff.

One thing that the author (and the ID proponent) missed, however, is that it isn't the DNA "code" itself with does things, it's the proteins. So proteins are analogous to subroutines in computer code. But a single copy of a protein enzyme, for example, is unlikely to meet up with its "target" molecule and produce a reaction, so cells pump out thousands (if not millions) of copies of each enzyme, in an effort (if I can anthropomorphize for a moment) to make it more likely that the enzymes will actually do whatever it is they're supposed to do.

Computers do not (not!) call the same subroutine over and over again in the hopes that it will eventually (stochastically) have the desired effect on the data being processed. DNA has no choice.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.

ThorGoLucky
Snuggle Wolf

USA
1486 Posts

Posted - 09/11/2014 :  15:11:34   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit ThorGoLucky's Homepage Send ThorGoLucky a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Aye, 'tis a stochastic mess of jostling molecules inside cells, unlike as depicted in pretty videos like https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uwnw4vg9I5Q
Go to Top of Page

The Rat
SFN Regular

Canada
1370 Posts

Posted - 10/08/2014 :  06:53:01   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit The Rat's Homepage Send The Rat a Private Message  Reply with Quote

Dawkins put it quite well in The Greatest Show On Earth, when he said that DNA is not a blueprint, it's a recipe.


Bailey's second law; There is no relationship between the three virtues of intelligence, education, and wisdom.

You fiend! Never have I encountered such corrupt and foul-minded perversity! Have you ever considered a career in the Church? - The Bishop of Bath and Wells, Blackadder II

Baculum's page: http://www.bebo.com/Profile.jsp?MemberId=3947338590
Edited by - The Rat on 10/08/2014 06:53:19
Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9687 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2014 :  09:55:55   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Computers do not (not!) call the same subroutine over and over again in the hopes that it will eventually (stochastically) have the desired effect on the data being processed. DNA has no choice.

When running Microsoft programs on my computer, I eventually end up hitting CTRL-ALT-Del several times with increasing frequency and energy, and eventually I get a response. Is the difference really that big?

Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26020 Posts

Posted - 10/12/2014 :  18:37:23   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse

When running Microsoft programs on my computer, I eventually end up hitting CTRL-ALT-Del several times with increasing frequency and energy, and eventually I get a response. Is the difference really that big?
[Snort]

If the dose makes the poison, what's the LD50 for Ctrl-Alt-Del killing an application? Is it different for different programs?

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.08 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000