Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 Creationist Book at Grand Canyon
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

tkster
Skeptic Friend

USA
193 Posts

Posted - 11/28/2004 :  15:21:04   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send tkster a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Dave W.

quote:
Originally posted by tkster

quote:
I fail to see the strawman in this. Would you please explain?

Edit:

If you interpret "daddy" as strictly litteral instead of meaning "ancestor", then yes it is a strawman. When I originally read it, I thought that meaning was implied.


I took it literal, I mean if verlch takes the Bible that literal I think I should be able to take his statements as such.
Well, even with a liberal interpretation of the word 'daddy', it's a strawman due to the fact that current evolutionary theory only claims that great apes and humans had a common ancestor, not that we evolved from any of the living ape species, which is implied by the original comment.



That too. Last time I had heard we shared a common ancestor.

tk
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 11/28/2004 :  22:11:11   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message
quote:
Well, even with a liberal interpretation of the word 'daddy', it's a strawman due to the fact that current evolutionary theory only claims that great apes and humans had a common ancestor, not that we evolved from any of the living ape species, which is implied by the original comment.


Hmmm, but are apes that are now extinct still part of the great ape family? Or what kind of ape are they exactly?

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26020 Posts

Posted - 11/28/2004 :  22:48:16   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
Ricky, the original comment - in all its ignorant glory - implies that evolution says that humans are descendants of a chimp, bonobo, gorilla, gibbon or organutan. But, what the theory and data actually tell us is that five million years ago (or so), the human-chimpanzee last common ancestor (HCLCA) roamed the Earth. It was neither a human nor a chimp. A million years before that, the last common ancestor of the HCLCA and today's gorillas walked around. It was not a human, chimp, HCLCA or a gorilla.

Of course, if the definition of 'ape' is "a primate with neither a tail nor cheek pouches," humans definitely are apes, and so were all our ancestors back several millions of years. But the comment is just a familiar knee-jerk reaction to the idea that humans are animals like the rest. It seeks special status for Homo sapiens outside the group "primates" entirely.

And, actually, that's a much better way to categorize it than just label it a strawman (though it is, still).

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.12 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000