Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Social Issues
 Do our drug laws help finance terrorism?
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

ronnywhite
SFN Regular

501 Posts

Posted - 09/13/2001 :  20:44:40  Show Profile Send ronnywhite a Private Message

comradebillyboy
Skeptic Friend

USA
188 Posts

Posted - 09/13/2001 :  21:25:22   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send comradebillyboy a Private Message
the us government has been paying the talaban to not produce opium. this year the bush administration paid the talaban more than $150,000,000 to not grow opium poppies. they have been doing their share to help the administration's revitalized war on drugs.

comrade billyboy
Go to Top of Page

ronnywhite
SFN Regular

501 Posts

Posted - 09/13/2001 :  21:34:08   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send ronnywhite a Private Message
quote:

the us government has been paying the talaban to not produce opium.



I wasn't aware of that- thanks for the reply, billy. Somehow, I'm skeptical of those folks... I've been hearing talk of our bombing them soon.

Ron White
Go to Top of Page

bestonnet_00
Skeptic Friend

Australia
358 Posts

Posted - 09/14/2001 :  00:31:21   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send bestonnet_00 an ICQ Message  Send bestonnet_00 a Yahoo! Message
I really hope that when the US commence bombing they bomb the right target. A repeat of what they did to Lebanon would definatly not be a good thing for the world.




Radioactive GM Crops.

Slightly above background.

Safe to eat.

But no activist would dare rip it out.

As they think it gives them cancer.
Go to Top of Page

ronnywhite
SFN Regular

501 Posts

Posted - 09/14/2001 :  02:59:43   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send ronnywhite a Private Message
"A repeat of what they did to Lebanon would definatly not be a good thing for the world."

I wholeheartedly agree- retribution is in order, but retribution designed to achieve our ends- to punish the bad guys, and send a message to others like them... not just wreak unbridled havoc and destruction, hoping the idea gets across somewhere along the way.

Ron White
Go to Top of Page

bestonnet_00
Skeptic Friend

Australia
358 Posts

Posted - 09/14/2001 :  03:14:13   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send bestonnet_00 an ICQ Message  Send bestonnet_00 a Yahoo! Message
The US will get back at whoever did this. They will probably have the rest of the world right behind them while doing so.

It seems to me very unlikely that the wrong target will be chosen and we should all hope it isn't.

The attack on the US is considered by most countries to be an attack on the whole world and the democratic principles that many of the countries on this planet operate by. Bin Laden is going to find out if Allah really does exist.




Radioactive GM Crops.

Slightly above background.

Safe to eat.

But no activist would dare rip it out.

As they think it gives them cancer.
Go to Top of Page

Greg
Skeptic Friend

USA
281 Posts

Posted - 09/14/2001 :  04:44:26   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Greg an AOL message Send Greg a Private Message
quote:
the us government has been paying the talaban to not produce opium. this year the bush administration paid the talaban more than $150,000,000 to not grow opium poppies. they have been doing their share to help the administration's revitalized war on drugs.


The UN says that the Taliban is simply stockpiling poppies in order to drive the price up. The Talibn is an excessdingly opressive regime and I wouldn't trust them at all. I don't think that one can seriously justify sending that type of aid to the type of regime they are for just not growing opium. There are many other possible reasons that the Administration did this, from bribe money to hand over Bin Laden to bribe money to allow US interests in the country.

Greg.

Go to Top of Page

Greg
Skeptic Friend

USA
281 Posts

Posted - 09/14/2001 :  06:33:14   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Greg an AOL message Send Greg a Private Message
Maybe I don't know what I'm talking about.

http://www.vny.com/cf/news/upidetail.cfm?QID=216037

Greg.

Go to Top of Page

Tokyodreamer
SFN Regular

USA
1447 Posts

Posted - 09/14/2001 :  06:33:31   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Tokyodreamer a Private Message
quote:

the us government has been paying the talaban to not produce opium. this year the bush administration paid the talaban more than $150,000,000 to not grow opium poppies. they have been doing their share to help the administration's revitalized war on drugs.


This is not a question meant to start an argument, I honestly don't know the answer, and am asking for enlightenment.

When you say the "Bush Administration" gave someone money, can you be more specific? Where does any executive branch department get $150,000,000 from? Surely they don't have a descretionary fund that big, and Pres. Bush signed off on using some of if this way?

Are you sure this wasn't a spending program already in place, and Bush simply didn't get around to stopping it (or even knowing about it), therefore is being misrepresented as activily doing this so as to paint him in the worst possible light?

Was any money given to the Taliban during the Clinton years?

And finally, if it is true that the Bush Administration actively and willfully did this, and no one has ever done this before this year, as the Bush Administration has only been in office for about 9 months, have they really had time to send that much money somewhere?!

------------

Hope springs eternal but there's no conviction
Actions mistaken for lip service paid
All this concern is the true contradiction
The world is insane...
Go to Top of Page

Greg
Skeptic Friend

USA
281 Posts

Posted - 09/14/2001 :  06:44:34   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Greg an AOL message Send Greg a Private Message
quote:
When you say the "Bush Administration" gave someone money, can you be more specific? Where does any executive branch department get $150,000,000 from? Surely they don't have a descretionary fund that big, and Pres. Bush signed off on using some of if this way?


The money came from foreign aid funds and has been payed out in installments over about 6 months - the last being about $43 Million about 4 weeks ago. I think that the total is somewhat less than $150 Million though. I will try to look up some more information if you like.

Greg.

Go to Top of Page

Tokyodreamer
SFN Regular

USA
1447 Posts

Posted - 09/14/2001 :  06:52:11   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Tokyodreamer a Private Message
quote:

The money came from foreign aid funds and has been payed out in installments over about 6 months - the last being about $43 Million about 4 weeks ago. I think that the total is somewhat less than $150 Million though. I will try to look up some more information if you like.


Thanks, I appreciate it.

I guess my main question is, who approves where the money goes? Am I wrong in thinking that only the Congress can spend any money (other than discretionary money that Congress gives to whoever to spend on whatever they want)?

So there's a foreign aid fund established. What role does the Executive Branch have in allocating that money, other than simple recommendations?

------------

Hope springs eternal but there's no conviction
Actions mistaken for lip service paid
All this concern is the true contradiction
The world is insane...
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 09/14/2001 :  07:55:23   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
quote:

quote:

The money came from foreign aid funds and has been payed out in installments over about 6 months - the last being about $43 Million about 4 weeks ago. I think that the total is somewhat less than $150 Million though. I will try to look up some more information if you like.


Thanks, I appreciate it.

I guess my main question is, who approves where the money goes? Am I wrong in thinking that only the Congress can spend any money (other than discretionary money that Congress gives to whoever to spend on whatever they want)?

So there's a foreign aid fund established. What role does the Executive Branch have in allocating that money, other than simple recommendations?

------------

Hope springs eternal but there's no conviction
Actions mistaken for lip service paid
All this concern is the true contradiction
The world is insane...



I believe we had a similar thread in the Medicine board. The executive branch can direct the spending of funds in discretionary accounts of any governmental branch by executive order. In this way, President Bush funded stem cell research on the strains he identified. In this way, he could direct monies to Afghanistan to bribe them not to sell opium.

Go to Top of Page

Tokyodreamer
SFN Regular

USA
1447 Posts

Posted - 09/14/2001 :  08:04:50   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Tokyodreamer a Private Message
quote:

The executive branch can direct the spending of funds in discretionary accounts of any governmental branch by executive order.


Ah, now we're gettin' somewhere!

Was there an executive order by Bush to do this?

------------

Hope springs eternal but there's no conviction
Actions mistaken for lip service paid
All this concern is the true contradiction
The world is insane...
Go to Top of Page

@tomic
Administrator

USA
4607 Posts

Posted - 09/14/2001 :  09:30:35   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit @tomic's Homepage Send @tomic a Private Message
I do know that Bush had the final say on where this money went. he allowed it to go to a nation that has allowed bin Laden to operate within its border for years. Keeping track of things like this is part of the President's job.

If he wasn't so bent on cutting taxes he might have done a better job in other areas. Maybe not. Either way, he had the say. Should have stopped it. Didn't

@tomic

Gravity, not just a good idea...it's the law!
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 09/14/2001 :  09:42:13   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
quote:

quote:

The executive branch can direct the spending of funds in discretionary accounts of any governmental branch by executive order.


Ah, now we're gettin' somewhere!

Was there an executive order by Bush to do this?

------------

Hope springs eternal but there's no conviction
Actions mistaken for lip service paid
All this concern is the true contradiction
The world is insane...



I will not attribute actions to an individual which I have no information on. While it is possible for the executive branch to direct these funds, the departments may be working on older directives or directives given by the executive branch to stop the proliferation of opium. If they have paid off Afghanistan in the past, then this is merely the continuation of this practice. I will say only that the executive through executive order has the possibility of directing this action.

Go to Top of Page

Greg
Skeptic Friend

USA
281 Posts

Posted - 09/14/2001 :  09:49:45   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Greg an AOL message Send Greg a Private Message
I'm digging on this but I don't have a lot of time right now however...

The $43 Million I spoke of above was released as humanitarian aid at the end of July (I heard about it about 4 weeks ago). Feminist groups were dismayed at this because of the Taliban's treatment of women and asked the Administration to explain. Colin Powell explained that the aid was for displaced refugees within the Afghan borders and was distributed through UN aid networks and not the Taliban.

There were other dispersments of money to the Taliban earlier that I believe came out of the drug war budget much of which is discretionary.

More later.

Greg.

Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.09 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000