Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 General Skepticism
 Starchild: deformity or ... alien hybrid?
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 3

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26020 Posts

Posted - 10/20/2005 :  21:30:30   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by markie

If alien spaceships do not visit our planet then one has to account for the vast numbers of respectable people who report not merely vague lights in the sky but specific features of the flying craft which appear to defy our technology.
The historical and sociological examination of UFO reports have already accounted for this, once you get past the "'respectable' means a person cannot delude him/herself or be mistaken in any way" nonsense. It's just a false dichotomy: this person wouldn't lie, so they must be telling the absolute truth. What a load.
quote:
The hybridization issue is a just a subplot of the larger UFO issue and not necessary for the latter to be true.
Of course, you must distinguish between "UFO reports" and "aliens have landed on Earth." There are genuine UFOs. There is no good evidence that aliens have landed on Earth. A genuine UFO is not evidence that aliens have landed on Earth. A genuine UFO is only evidence that someone saw something which nobody has been able to identify. Claiming that it must be evidence that aliens have landed on Earth is therefore an argument from ignorance: we don't know what it was, therefore it was an alien.
quote:
Regarding the unlikelihood of aliens mating with earth humans, that of course invokes the premise that human evolution has been essentially random and purposeless. That premise is nothing more than a belief really. Or put differently, that premise is an active disbelief in evolutionary overcontrol.
No, that "premise" is actually the tentative conclusion one can come to through the complete lack of any evidence of "evolutionary overcontrol."
quote:
But it leads to an interesting question: Would the idea a higher Power be more acceptable to a disbeliever if aliens were found to be real?
Thus is the idiocy in the movie Contact brought to life. Why should the presence or absence of other mortal life in this universe have any affect upon our belief or disbelief in a "higher power?"

The only way I'm aware that extraterrestrial life has any bearing on anyone's religious beliefs is that some fundamentalists Christians believe that any alien which might exist will necessarily go to hell because they're ignorant of Jesus and so cannot accept His sacrifice and redeem their own sin.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.12 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000