|
|
|
|
Kilik
BANNED
110 Posts |
|
|
BigPapaSmurf
SFN Die Hard
3192 Posts |
 Posted - 11/07/2005 : 13:28:48 [Permalink]
|
(cough) "Good reasearchers" dont dismiss perfectly reasonable explinations which do not agree with what they are trying to prove. Nor do they usually take dangerous mind altering drugs and combine areas of science which have nothing to do with each other.
This guy is on the far end of the bad researcher list. |
"...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History
"...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book, De Morte Peregrini |
 |
|
|
moakley
SFN Regular
USA
1888 Posts |
Posted - 11/07/2005 : 14:57:21 [Permalink]
|
quote:
Graham Hancock has raised many issues ignored by conventional scientists. He has done a good job of challenging the commonly held beliefs, and has withstood and answered scrutiny. His work is definitley based in reality and facts.
This just seems familiar ...
quote:
Erich Von Daniken has raised many issues ignored by conventional scientists. He has done a good job of challenging the commonly held beliefs, and has withstood and answered scrutiny. His work is definitley based in reality and facts.
Oh yeah, 30 years ago I held similar beliefs about another person.
|
Life is good
Philosophy is questions that may never be answered. Religion is answers that may never be questioned. -Anonymous |
|
|
|
Kilik
BANNED
110 Posts |
Posted - 11/07/2005 : 15:38:00 [Permalink]
|
| yeah, but you didn't know things that I know, it's absolutely not the same and not a good comparison |
|
|
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26034 Posts |
Posted - 11/07/2005 : 15:51:34 [Permalink]
|
quote:
Originally posted by Kilik
Any "conventional" scientists who have tried to discredit him, got soundly defeated and embarassed
Wow. Not only has Kilik turned a single incident into "any" scientists, but he's made the not necessarily correct assumption that because someone treated Hancock unfairly, it somehow lends supports to any/all of Hancock's claims. It's undoubtable that someone, somewhere, has treated the Flat-Earthers unfairly, but that doesn't mean they're correct.
Furthermore,quote:
yeah, but you didn't know things that I know, it's absolutely not the same and not a good comparison
Kilik bases (partly) his support of Hancock on secret knowledge. |
- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too. |
|
|
|
moakley
SFN Regular
USA
1888 Posts |
Posted - 11/08/2005 : 10:02:51 [Permalink]
|
quote:
Originally posted by Kilik
yeah, but you didn't know things that I know, it's absolutely not the same and not a good comparison
Agreed. It is not a good comparison, at this time, for you. |
Life is good
Philosophy is questions that may never be answered. Religion is answers that may never be questioned. -Anonymous |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Topic Locked
