Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 Music and Evolution
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

ktesibios
SFN Regular

USA
505 Posts

Posted - 11/14/2005 :  13:02:10   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send ktesibios a Private Message
Some funny things about the human ear-brain system.

If you look at this plot of the sensitivity versus frequency of the human ear (scroll down to fig. 3.2a), you'll notice that the absolute sensitivity of our hearing is maximized around the 2 kHz area.

Our sense of pitch is most independent of loudness right in that same area:

quote:
Perceived loudness increases logarithmically with amplitude. Neural mechanisms for loudness include two layers of sensory receptors with differential sensitivity, saturation at high intensities, and changes in neural firing rate. At the same physical intensity, frequencies near the center of the audible frequency range are heard as louder than those at the low and high ends of the range. Increased loudness slightly raises the pitch of frequencies above 2,000 Hz and lowers the pitch of frequencies below 1,000 Hz, and it may affect pitch by introducing *combination tones.


http://gate.tenhauser.com/pos.html; also see Fritz Winckel's Music, Sound and Sensation

Our ability to discriminate between slightly different pitches and loudnesses is also at its best in the range above 1 Khz.

In short, our hearing acuity tends to be at its greatest right smack dab in the part of the sound spectrum which has been shown empirically to be the most critical for speech comprehension. ( See Davis & Davis, Sound System Engineering 2nd. edition or Glen Ballou, ed.,The New Audio Cyclopedia or pretty much any textbook on sound system design or psychoacoustics for more).

The adaptive value, for a species which lives in groups, of physical features which promote intra-species communication aren't hard to envisage. Other animals have their own sensory optimizations, evolved under different conditions of environment and lifestyle.

The fact that as an intelligent species we've learned to take advantage of some of the features of our acoustic perception systems for our own enjoyment isn't uch of an argument against those systems having evolved; what we know about how they perform seems to me actually an argument in favor of their having been acted upon by natural selection.


"The Republican agenda is to turn the United States into a third-world shithole." -P.Z.Myers
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.14 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000