Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Religion
 US attitudes
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Scotty
New Member

United Kingdom
12 Posts

Posted - 01/10/2006 :  05:56:41  Show Profile Send Scotty a Private Message
Here in the UK we had on TV last night a program by well known scientist Richard Dawking - well known as an active Athiest

He interviewed a group of Athiests - one of them stated that in the US to-day there's no way anyone could be elected to office if he professed he was an Athiest -

True?




"Nac Mac Feegle! The Wee Free Men! Nae king! Nae quin! Nae laird! We willna be fooled again!" -
T. Prattchett - Wee Free Men

pleco
SFN Addict

USA
2998 Posts

Posted - 01/10/2006 :  06:20:08   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit pleco's Homepage Send pleco a Private Message
IMHO, I think this is more true than not. It would depend on the part of the country they were running in, but for the most part this would be correct.

by Filthy
The neo-con methane machine will soon be running at full fart.
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 01/10/2006 :  06:37:50   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Scotty

Here in the UK we had on TV last night a program by well known scientist Richard Dawking - well known as an active Athiest

He interviewed a group of Athiests - one of them stated that in the US to-day there's no way anyone could be elected to office if he professed he was an Athiest -

True?


Entirely. Except perhaps in Vermont; they made an avowed and unrepentant Socialist the mayor of Burlington, then elected him to the House of representitives, and now he's running the the Senate. He'll win it, too.

I don't know what Bernie Sanders' religious affilations might be, if any.


"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 01/10/2006 :  06:45:08   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Scotty

Here in the UK we had on TV last night a program by well known scientist Richard Dawking - well known as an active Athiest

He interviewed a group of Athiests - one of them stated that in the US to-day there's no way anyone could be elected to office if he professed he was an Athiest -

True?







Sadly, yes. Even before the insurgence of religious fevor, atheists were rarely elected to office. Even though states who had religious tests written into their state constitutions had them overturned in courts, religion still remains a campaign issue.

Although not being the RIGHT religion is also a problem in most areas of the US as well. It's a societally enforced informal religious test imposed on candidates.

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page

Scotty
New Member

United Kingdom
12 Posts

Posted - 01/10/2006 :  07:52:30   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Scotty a Private Message
Thanks guys - coming from the UK where - in the words of Tony Blair's one time spokesman politicians "don't do religion" - this is a real eye opener...


"Nac Mac Feegle! The Wee Free Men! Nae king! Nae quin! Nae laird! We willna be fooled again!" -
T. Prattchett - Wee Free Men
Go to Top of Page

BigPapaSmurf
SFN Die Hard

3192 Posts

Posted - 01/10/2006 :  08:21:26   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send BigPapaSmurf a Private Message
Hell, even Catholics couldnt get elected in certain parts of the country.

"...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History

"...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book, De Morte Peregrini
Go to Top of Page

BigPapaSmurf
SFN Die Hard

3192 Posts

Posted - 01/10/2006 :  08:22:37   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send BigPapaSmurf a Private Message
Bernie Sanders is Jewish by the way, according to Answers.com

"...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History

"...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book, De Morte Peregrini
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 01/10/2006 :  10:14:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message
I believe there was a pole, in which people were asked that if they would vote for an atheist, knowing nothing more about him/her, and 49% said no.

But this was a while ago, I'll have to see if I could find that again.

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

pleco
SFN Addict

USA
2998 Posts

Posted - 01/10/2006 :  11:17:45   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit pleco's Homepage Send pleco a Private Message
I wonder if there is a poll of atheists asking them if they would not vote for someone because they are an evangelical christian?

by Filthy
The neo-con methane machine will soon be running at full fart.
Go to Top of Page

BigPapaSmurf
SFN Die Hard

3192 Posts

Posted - 01/10/2006 :  11:51:21   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send BigPapaSmurf a Private Message
Well I know we anuminists would be almost 100% against such a candidate, unless of course the other option was worse, like a Scientologist.

"...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History

"...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book, De Morte Peregrini
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 01/10/2006 :  13:15:33   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by BigPapaSmurf

Well I know we anuminists would be almost 100% against such a candidate, unless of course the other option was worse, like a Scientologist.



Such a situation would never come up because I would have already left the country.

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

pleco
SFN Addict

USA
2998 Posts

Posted - 01/10/2006 :  13:41:28   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit pleco's Homepage Send pleco a Private Message
I guess I said that because it shouldn't be a shock that religious persons would not vote for an atheist just like atheists would not vote for religious persons.

by Filthy
The neo-con methane machine will soon be running at full fart.
Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 01/10/2006 :  13:54:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by pleco

I guess I said that because it shouldn't be a shock that religious persons would not vote for an atheist just like atheists would not vote for religious persons.

Atheists might not vote for fanatically religious people, but they vote for religious people all the time. There are no non-religious candiates to choose from. I voted for Kerry the last presidential election.


"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Go to Top of Page

pleco
SFN Addict

USA
2998 Posts

Posted - 01/10/2006 :  13:57:47   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit pleco's Homepage Send pleco a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by H. Humbert
Atheists might not vote for fanatically religious people, but they vote for religious people all the time. There are no non-religious candiates to choose from. I voted for Kerry the last presidential election.



This is true. I should have qualified my statement. There are probably different "kinds" (lol) of atheists, meaning I'm sure there are some that would never vote for a religious person of any type.

Would it be fair to say that atheists are more "open minded" in voting preferences than religious people (of any type)?

by Filthy
The neo-con methane machine will soon be running at full fart.
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 01/10/2006 :  14:50:45   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by pleco

quote:
Originally posted by H. Humbert
Atheists might not vote for fanatically religious people, but they vote for religious people all the time. There are no non-religious candiates to choose from. I voted for Kerry the last presidential election.



This is true. I should have qualified my statement. There are probably different "kinds" (lol) of atheists, meaning I'm sure there are some that would never vote for a religious person of any type.

Would it be fair to say that atheists are more "open minded" in voting preferences than religious people (of any type)?



I believe that it would be fair to say that atheists are more likely to vote for a candidate based on the central governmental issues of the race instead of religious affiliation. (Although, one could make a strong argument that atheists who always vote against rabidly religious people have a valid governmental issue against the entanglement of church and state.)

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page

beskeptigal
SFN Die Hard

USA
3834 Posts

Posted - 01/11/2006 :  05:03:51   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send beskeptigal a Private Message
You couldn't get elected President. I'm not so sure you couldn't get elected to other offices.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.11 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000