Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Health
 Crazy mom....
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

Zebra
Skeptic Friend

USA
354 Posts

Posted - 07/03/2006 :  23:42:16   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Zebra a Private Message
They were found, the mom (Tina Carlsen) was arrested & initially bond was set at $500,000 - then she was released on personal recognizance. She's breastfeeding her son. The "emergency" surgery was to place a peritoneal dialysis catheter in anticipation that dialysis will be necessary before long.

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer on 6/27 reported:
quote:
A 9-month-old baby at the center of an emotional debate about whether he needs surgery -- and whose mother allegedly kidnapped him -- will have the operation, a Pierce County judge ruled Monday.

Judge John McCarthy said he is convinced that the surgery is in the best interest of the child, Riley Rogers, who has suffered from kidney problems since birth.

The baby has been in state custody since June 9, after doctors insisted that he needs surgery to insert a tube so that he can undergo dialysis to treat a kidney ailment. His mother, Tina Carlsen, wanted to try naturopathic treatments instead.

Carlsen is accused of sneaking the baby out of Children's Hospital and Regional Medical Center in a diaper bag on Thursday, hours before the surgery was to take place.

Seattle police caught up with her on Saturday, taking the baby back to the hospital and Carlsen to jail.

In a crowded Tacoma courtroom Monday, attorneys for Child Protective Services and the baby's parents argued about what was best for the child.

The father, Todd Rogers, has agreed to the surgery but feels he hasn't gotten enough opportunity to ask doctors about the risks and whether dialysis will actually help his son, said his attorney, Deborah McFadden.

Several of Carlsen's relatives have had similar kidney trouble. One didn't seek any medical treatment and is fine; another had a transplant and regrets it, McFadden said.

The parents may also have trouble trusting doctors because when their baby was born, they were told they should "take him home and love him" because he would live for only a few weeks, their attorneys said.


Carlsen's lawyer, Mike Shipley, defended the parents' right to look into other treatment options.

"Just because a doctor says something, doesn't make it so," Shipley said. "They went and sought other answers to this medical problem."

But Child Protective Services' attorney Karen Calhoun urged the judge to authorize the surgery. She said the baby's kidneys are functioning poorly, leaving him at risk of dying from something as minor as a cold.

She said while the situation is not an emergency, the baby would likely suffer "a slow-motion death" if he doesn't have dialysis. If he gets it, she said, by the age of about 2 he might be able to get a transplant and have "an opportunity to live a normal life."

McCarthy ordered the surgery but set a hearing next week to determine whether the baby will remain in state care. He said Todd Rogers could have four hours of supervised visits with his baby each week and could be at the hospital -- presumably in a waiting room -- during the surgery.

Rogers said he was crushed that he could see his son for only such limited hours and worried that the baby would be trying to heal from surgery in a room full of strangers.

"I'm scared," he said. "I don't know what's going to happen now."

Carlsen, 34, remained in jail Monday on $500,000 bail. If convicted of the second-degree kidnapping charge she faces, she could be sentenced to up to a year in jail.


And, The Seattle Times on 6/29 reported this:
quote:
..."We don't feel it's necessary to keep her in jail any longer," said Dan Donohoe, spokesman for King County Prosecuting Attorney Norm Maleng.

Donohoe declined to say whether the second-degree kidnapping charge would be reduced, but he said the office will "continue to review the case and all the circumstances."

Prosecutors expected to ask the judge that Carlsen be required to meet certain conditions of release set by the state Child Protective Services (CPS). A CPS spokeswoman declined to say what those conditions would be.

Carlsen's lawyer, Jim Lobsenz, said Wednesday that an agreement had not yet been reached to allow Carlsen to have contact with her son, Riley Rogers.

Carlsen, 34, has been in jail since Saturday, when she was arrested on a second-degree kidnapping charge to end a statewide Amber Alert issued last Thursday, after Carlsen took Riley from Children's Hospital & Regional Medical Center in Seattle.

Riley has been returned to Children's to undergo surgery to implant devices enabling him to have kidney dialysis.

Carlson lost custody of Riley to state Child Protective Services on June 9 after she refused to go along with doctors' advice that Riley, whose kidneys may be failing, needed to be ready to start dialysis.

When the Amber Alert was issued, police said Riley was in "imminent danger" of dying without emergency surgery. The next day, the hospital's medical director issued a statement saying Riley, while vulnerable, was not in imminent danger.

Riley's father, Todd Rogers, said Wednesday that he was thankful to hear Carlsen could be released.

"She's not a danger to anyone," he said. "She lives for Riley."

Rogers has defended Carlsen, and Wednesday he said she had simply been following the advice of relatives who have kidney disease to "search the world over" to find alternatives to dialysis.

"They told her she was doing the right thing," Rogers said.


Sounds like major communication problems - the parents may not want to hear what the doctors have to say, and they may also not being able to understand the medical discussion sufficiently to make an informed decision. Quite possibly the doctors didn't realize (until things got out of control) what the mom's concerns were, and where they were coming from. The (adult?) family members' advice was probably intended to be very supportive and well-meaning, but sounds like a big part of the problem. (If this kid does have failing kidneys, he will need dialysis to avoid a slow death. They haven't said what his kidney condition is, maybe polycystic kidney disease? And, doesn't matter if you "search the world over", if your kidneys aren't working there are limited options.) It would behoove the medical and CPS team, you'd think, to find out more about the family-kidney disease connection and try to address mom's concerns there. Or, maybe they have and just couldn't get anywhere.

The statewide Amber Alert, saying the child was in grave and immediate danger if he didn't have surgery right away, for what turns out was a procedure in anticipation of future dialysis....that seems like a big oops on the part of the hospital and the police, another communication snafu - at best. The cynical view would be that the mis-information sure heightened the sense of alarm among news media and eagle-eyed citizens, maybe helped find the mom more quickly.

I think, you know, freedom means freedom for everyone* -Dick Cheney

*some restrictions may apply
Go to Top of Page

beskeptigal
SFN Die Hard

USA
3834 Posts

Posted - 07/04/2006 :  12:40:55   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send beskeptigal a Private Message
I think there was more medical care involved they were afraid the mom wouldn't provide than just the surgery issue. Reporters usually get these kind of details all wrong. Clearly the hospital didn't like the way the surgery was being claimed as emergency surgery, but that doesn't mean the surgery was the only issue.
Edited by - beskeptigal on 07/04/2006 12:43:04
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.06 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000