Skeptic Friends Network

Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Cool on many levels
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 4

Skeptic Friend

275 Posts

Posted - 12/01/2006 :  11:50:59   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send perrodetokio a Private Message
Hello, I´ve been following this really interesting discussion. Although I won´t be adding anything at the moment, there´s a very good wensite I found a few months ago. Check it out!

It sounds quite logical, even though I wouldn´t say I am an expert at this issue.


Perro de Tokio

"Yes I have a belief in a creator/God but do not know that he exists." Bill Scott

"They are still mosquitoes! They did not turn into whales or lizards or anything else. They are still mosquitoes!..." Bill Scott

"We should have millions of missing links or transition fossils showing a fish turning into a philosopher..." Bill Scott
Go to Top of Page

SFN Regular

675 Posts

Posted - 12/01/2006 :  15:20:24   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Neurosis an AOL message Send Neurosis a Private Message
I think a major point here is that we don't know too much about how our brains work. Except for Egoman who knows all, the rest of us are just beginning to understand the brain. In any case it is almost an established fact at this point that what we call consciousness is an illusion created, obviously, in the brain as an ad hoc processing of decisions and subroutines made within the deeper cortex. In all likelihood when we create AI it will be as dumbfounded as we are about the decisions it makes. Of course, as technology progresses the gap will widen and any tech-thriller director will tell ya, thats when they will take over .

Actually, I always thought that the smarter something/someone got the less likely it would be to be oppressive. In any case, the bigger picture is that emotion and desire etc. are really just chemical interpretations that give bodily cues. If we did create AI could anyone argue that it does not experience happiness the way we do?

On the hopeless side of things, it took 4.5 billion years to perfect the human brain to this level. Even if we give us a genuinely conceeded one up on nature, I doubt AI will be a moral question in our life times. Although, It would be fun to hear the religious chime in on the morals of creating thinking beings. They can't even handle growing organs and stem cell research.

Facts! Pssh, you can prove anything even remotely true with facts.
- Homer Simpson

[God] is an infinite nothing from nowhere with less power over our universe than the secretary of agriculture.
- Prof. Frink

Lisa: Yes, but wouldn't you rather know the truth than to delude yourself for happiness?
Marge: Well... um.... [goes outside to jump on tampoline with Homer.]
Edited by - Neurosis on 12/01/2006 15:26:39
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 4 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.

Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.09 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000