Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Politics
 Obama won't use 'genocide' in statement on 1915 Ar
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Mycroft
Skeptic Friend

USA
427 Posts

Posted - 04/26/2009 :  09:45:48  Show Profile Send Mycroft a Private Message  Reply with Quote


http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-obama-genocide25-2009apr25,0,2595139.story

President Barack Obama will not use the word "genocide" today when he issues a statement remembering the slaughter of more than a million Armenians during the last days of the Ottoman Empire.

On the anniversary of the day in 1915 that marked the beginning of the atrocities in Turkey, the president instead will ask for an examination of the past "so that it can be better understood," according to a senior administration official.

Obama still stands by the views he has expressed on the subject in the past, the official said today, speaking in advance of the president's statement on condition of anonymity. As a U.S. senator and a presidential candidate, Obama called for Turkey to acknowledge the genocide -- and promised to do so himself if elected president.

But since moving into the Oval office, Obama has backed away from the pledge out of concern that a furor over it might disrupt delicate diplomatic discussions now going on between Armenia and Turkey.


How disappointing. I wonder what he believes is the worst that can happen if he doesn't pander to this particular type of denial?

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13476 Posts

Posted - 04/26/2009 :  10:20:26   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Mycroft:
How disappointing. I wonder what he believes is the worst that can happen if he doesn't pander to this particular type of denial?


So are you saying that it's pandering to be pragmatic while negotiations are going on between Armenia and Turkey? Would you torpedo a negotiation for the sake of laying a claim to a moral high ground? Why not take the reason he gave at face value?

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 04/26/2009 :  15:45:41   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I'm not an expert in such things, but I agree that this is some delicate stuff and that some approaches may be better than others in the long run, even if it means stuff like this happens.
Go to Top of Page

Machi4velli
SFN Regular

USA
854 Posts

Posted - 04/26/2009 :  19:22:01   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Machi4velli a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Kil
Why not take the reason he gave at face value?

Skepticism. He chose to avoid what he considers truth for political expediency, which is the reason he gave for the distortion. This instance in particular may not be very important, but I can certainly see that some may legitimately fault him for it.

"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people."
-Giordano Bruno

"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, but the illusion of knowledge."
-Stephen Hawking

"Seeking what is true is not seeking what is desirable"
-Albert Camus
Edited by - Machi4velli on 04/26/2009 19:28:09
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13476 Posts

Posted - 04/26/2009 :  22:55:13   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Machi4velli:
...but I can certainly see that some may legitimately fault him for it.

And every single president that has come before him.

My guess is that even those who run for that office must face some harsh realities that even they didn't fully comprehend before they got there. What president hasn't take some lumps over campaign promises that were not fulfilled? All in all, I would say that this president has set the bar much higher for himself than the last one, and the one before him. And they managed to stumble too. The last one, disastrously.

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

Simon
SFN Regular

USA
1992 Posts

Posted - 04/27/2009 :  10:00:44   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Simon a Private Message  Reply with Quote
It is not denialism as he never pretended that it never happened.

He just chose not to use -publicly- a particular word. That's quite different.

The US are in a delicate situation in Turkey. They need it as many of their operations in the Middle-East are based in the bases they have their. But, at the same time, relationship between the US and Turkey were quite damaged by Bush's politic and douchebaggy attitude.
So Obama deciding to play it self does make a lot of sense. And, he, the genocide happened 94 years ago. It's not like it is any kind of emergency!

Look again at that dot. That's here. That's home. That's us. On it everyone you love, everyone you know, everyone you ever heard of, every human being who ever was, lived out their lives. The aggregate of our joy and suffering, thousands of confident religions, ideologies, and economic doctrines, every hunter and forager, every hero and coward, every creator and destroyer of civilization, every king and peasant, every young couple in love, every mother and father, hopeful child, inventor and explorer, every teacher of morals, every corrupt politician, every "superstar," every "supreme leader," every saint and sinner in the history of our species lived there – on a mote of dust suspended in a sunbeam.
Carl Sagan - 1996
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.07 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000