Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 Instructor wouldn't teach Adam & Eve, is fired
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 3

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 09/25/2007 :  19:30:56   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by H. Humbert

Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME
The point is; if you would think and reason prior to posting, that almost any headline could be construed as misleading if one cherry picks from the article.


Oh, I'm quite aware of the point you were trying to make. By splitting hairs with Mooner's choice of words, you're attempting to excuse the dozens of times you've titled your threads with gross misrepresentations of the truth. You aren't a complicated individual, Jerome. Your intentions are as easy to read as a child's when eyeing a cookie jar.

And your attempt has failed.


If you had it all figured out before I explained it; why were you arguing against the reverse of my initial statement?




What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 09/25/2007 :  19:38:07   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME
If you had it all figured out before I explained it; why were you arguing against the reverse of my initial statement?
Wow. I figured out what you were attempting to do. However I argued against your initial statement because it was wrong, which is why your attempt has failed.

Do you get it yet? Or do I need to speak more slowly?


"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Edited by - H. Humbert on 09/25/2007 19:38:40
Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 09/25/2007 :  19:44:41   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by H. Humbert

Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME
If you had it all figured out before I explained it; why were you arguing against the reverse of my initial statement?
Wow. I figured out what you were attempting to do. However I argued against your initial statement because it was wrong, which is why your attempt has failed.

Do you get it yet? Or do I need to speak more slowly?





Here is my initial statement:
First off, I absolutely do not think the teacher should be fired or punished in any way. There should be exposer to ideas which make others uncomfortable in the college setting.


You were arguing as if I had said the reverse. I implore you to read what you are responding to before posting. You are digging the hole deeper by the post.


What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 09/25/2007 :  19:53:04   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

Here is my initial statement:
First off, I absolutely do not think the teacher should be fired or punished in any way. There should be exposer to ideas which make others uncomfortable in the college setting.


You were arguing as if I had said the reverse. I implore you to read what you are responding to before posting. You are digging the hole deeper by the post.


You are trying to change the topic. Everyone up to this point was arguing over your criticism of the title, nothing else. That is, except for one point when HH said:

Of course I did. But unlike you, I understood it. The teacher refused to teach the story of Genesis as historic fact, and instead taught it as a myth or fairy tale, exactly as any educated professor should. He also gave no single religion preference in his classroom, as is in keeping with the US Constitution. Only creationists could find such impartial, common sense treatment "denigrating" to their religion. The only thing the professor did wrong was acquaint those students with reality.


This is merely a summary for you because you believed HH did not read the article. No one is arguing over what you think about what happened. Instead, they are attempting to show you that your criticism of the title of this thread is in fact wrong.


Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 09/25/2007 :  19:56:40   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Cune understands what I'm trying to say. Ricky seems to get it just fine. Why are you the only one who seems to have so much trouble with simple comprehension, Jerome? And doesn't that tell you anything?


"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 09/25/2007 :  20:07:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Ricky

You are trying to change the topic. Everyone up to this point was arguing over your criticism of the title, nothing else.


Really:

How did the teacher "denigrate" the students' religion? By not teaching that Adam and Eve were historical personages. So it's the same thing.


This is an argument over as to the validity of the students "feeling denigrated".

My point is almost any headline could be argued as misleading. I am not arguing that this headline is misleading. HH, has said that he knew that was my point, yet he was arguing over the validity of the feelings of the students and the validity of the headline.

The point of my post was to show that claiming invalid headline does nothing more than create an argument over nothing with no point.






What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26020 Posts

Posted - 09/25/2007 :  20:07:19   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

You did not read the article based on your response.

You are a mockery every time you respond to me.
Enough.

H.'s response was in no way mocking you, Jerome, but it set you off anyway. And so, after I read the rest of the thread...

Warning Official Warning Warning

Goodbye, Jerome.

H.: You need to stop letting these things get to you. Got it?


- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

marty
BANNED

63 Posts

Posted - 09/25/2007 :  20:25:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send marty a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dave W.

Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

You did not read the article based on your response.

You are a mockery every time you respond to me.
Enough.

H.'s response was in no way mocking you, Jerome, but it set you off anyway. And so, after I read the rest of the thread...

Warning Official Warning Warning

Goodbye, Jerome.

H.: You need to stop letting these things get to you. Got it?




Jerome is not claiming HH is mocking him.

Jerome is claiming HH is a mockery.

Having a hard time controlling the children when a superior intelligence twists their minds into knots, and exposes their inadequate minds?

You are a sad, sad man.

Very little critical thinking going on here.





Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 09/25/2007 :  20:27:23   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse

Can't American Evangelicals and otherwise religiously insane decide on one state in USA, take it over and leave the rest of the US population in peace? They can then leave the Union and become their own backward theocracy, and USA can reclaim it's place as a leading nation of the world.
Some of the Dominionists want to do just that, in South Carolina. But, Mab, we settled this kid of secessionist issue almost a century and a half ago, when that same state succeeded, and the Civil War broke out. It's still our bloodiest war.

This time, we're encouraging them to move to Sweden.


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26020 Posts

Posted - 09/25/2007 :  20:30:02   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by marty

Jerome is not claiming HH is mocking him.

Jerome is claiming HH is a mockery.
Then that is far more offensive.

Thank you for clarifying that I was taking it too easy on Jerome.
Having a hard time controlling the children when a superior intelligence twists their minds into knots, and exposes their inadequate minds?
No, Jerome. It's not at all strange how you, marty, have the same IP as Jerome and showed up minutes after Jerome was banned to continue Jerome's attack. And look, nary a post from you since Jerome was un-banned. Bye-bye to you, too.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 09/25/2007 :  20:33:46   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME
Boy, Oh, Boy.

Do you guys even read what I write prior to responding.

I said that the teachers should not be fired and that unconformable thoughts should be talked about in college.
Good thing I wasn't arguing that point! (And too bad (sort of) that you can't reply)

The two of you are arguing against a phantom of your own creation.
No, you're simply arguing that this is the case. That doesn't make it so.

The point is; if you would think and reason prior to posting, that almost any headline could be construed as misleading if one cherry picks from the article.
True. The question is if that's the case here.
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 09/25/2007 :  20:41:34   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME

First off, I absolutely do not think the teacher should be fired or punished in any way. There should be exposer to ideas which make others uncomfortable in the college setting.

Having said that.

I have been maligned for misrepresenting my thread titles recently. I would like to point out this is a fact for this thread.

Instructor wouldn't teach Adam & Eve, is fired


Bitterman's Tuesday course was telecast to students in Osceola over the Iowa Communications Network. A few students in the Osceola classroom, he said, thought the lesson was "denigrating their religion."


Again, I have no problem with the professor denigrating anyones religion; it is that the title belies the facts presented in the article.


Fair is fair.




I think I made the title as accurate as I knew how, given the restraints of its length. I would have prefered giving the entire concept (including "... as history"), but there wasn't enough space. I first used "Creationism" instead of "Adam and Eve," but felt that, though defensible, was a bit less accurate. I assumed that the short version was the best I could do, and left the details for the post itself.

Sometimes, though that wasn't the case here, I will write a title that is deliberately provocative and even deceptive in literal terms, as a narrative hook, then let the post sort things out. But I don't do this in order to leave a false impression, only to get people to read the post.


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 09/25/2007 :  20:47:56   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
In re-reading things a few times, I can almost see Jerome's point. But it's really only if one takes a remarkably hard line regarding the English language. Jerome seems (?) to be arguing that since the professor in question wasn't forced to literally teach the Bible, then the headline is misleading. And in that strict sense, he's right. However, a broader (and more honest) reading of the language shows that the headline is correct. The professor opted to teach a Western Civ class using, in part, the Bible (a logical move), but because he didn't approach it literally, and because students were offended by this, he lost his job.

Yes, Mooner's headline is sensationalist. But it is not incorrect. Compare this to Jerome's thread titled "Tazer and Arrested by Kerry!" and you see how they just don't compare.

Perhaps if he didn't cry wolf so often...
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 09/25/2007 :  21:08:43   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I think that if I had been able to title the post, "Instructor wouldn't teach Adam & Eve as history," it would have been equally "sensationalist," but more accurate. I think the sensationalism comes from the facts of the story. And if I'd been able to be really accurate with the title, it could include the whole story.

I'm pretty comfortable with the way I did it. I haven't yet figured out a more accurate way to summarize the subject in so few words.


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 09/26/2007 :  05:38:28   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by HalfMooner

I think that if I had been able to title the post, "Instructor wouldn't teach Adam & Eve as history," it would have been equally "sensationalist," but more accurate. I think the sensationalism comes from the facts of the story. And if I'd been able to be really accurate with the title, it could include the whole story.

I'm pretty comfortable with the way I did it. I haven't yet figured out a more accurate way to summarize the subject in so few words.


No, I think it was perfectly fine and got the point across without being misleading. It doesn't compare at all to some of Jerome's completely misleading headlines.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.12 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000