Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 Debunking of Jimi's points
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 17

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9696 Posts

Posted - 11/01/2004 :  16:42:19   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Siberia

Why do I have an impression he'll never post that rebuttal?

It doesn't matter... Peptide did his rebuttal in one week, if Jimi don't do the same we can label him a loser. Of course, I don't think we'll be able to declare him loser in a post at Skeptic Times, but he'll be one none the less if he doesn't show up.

If creationism is a superior theory, he shouldn't have any problem whipping up a powerful rebuttal...

Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Go to Top of Page

Siberia
SFN Addict

Brazil
2322 Posts

Posted - 11/01/2004 :  16:49:21   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Siberia's Homepage  Send Siberia an AOL message  Send Siberia a Yahoo! Message Send Siberia a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse

quote:
Originally posted by Siberia

Why do I have an impression he'll never post that rebuttal?

It doesn't matter... Peptide did his rebuttal in one week, if Jimi don't do the same we can label him a loser. Of course, I don't think we'll be able to declare him loser in a post at Skeptic Times, but he'll be one none the less if he doesn't show up.

If creationism is a superior theory, he shouldn't have any problem whipping up a powerful rebuttal...


Well, true...
But I still wanted to see how he'd overcome the nylon bug

"Why are you afraid of something you're not even sure exists?"
- The Kovenant, Via Negativa

"People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefs."
-- unknown
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 11/01/2004 :  17:34:22   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message
No, I think jimi will post. His post may not be a few weeks, but he will post. Even jimi can see that if he doesn't post, he will be regarded as a loser (in the debate sense). All he has to do is post and he has a chance at winning, although not really in this situation.

What I would really like to see is jimi's entire post be:

"All of your arguments are based on unform. and this is wrong."

I would laugh so hard at that.

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

furshur
SFN Regular

USA
1536 Posts

Posted - 11/02/2004 :  07:00:15   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send furshur a Private Message
Ricky get ready to laugh. I think he post will actually read:

"All of your arguments are based on unform. and this is wrong."

Reference "Dr. Dino website".

By the way Peptide outstanding job.


If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know.
Go to Top of Page

mountain_hare
New Member

13 Posts

Posted - 11/03/2004 :  02:53:50   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send mountain_hare a Private Message
What I predict will happen in the typical Creationist hack job. Cut and paste lumps of 'argument' from Creationist sites, and sit back and watch the fireworks. Afterwards, he will claim victory.

"This may sound really off the wall, but listen to me. You've got to believe me. I've not gone crazy, and I'm not fooling around. At first I thought I was losing my mind. But now I know I'm not. It's not me. The scientific community. It's being invaded by Creationism. Someone's ignorant delusions come to life. Little by little, the
invasion is spreading. Trying to swallow up everything in ignorance."

The words of Dr. Harry to the disbelieving scientific community, who were amazed that such idiotic ideals as "Creationism" would ever be taken seriously.
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 11/04/2004 :  06:53:29   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message
I'm confused-- perhaps someone could remind me. Over at the debate thread, I now see this line:

"Neither Introduction are for rebuttals so any "rebuttal" will be removed. You are to present your argument in favor of your theory; rebuttals will occur next with no time restriction" (emphasis mine).

I don't recall reading that earlier. My understanding was that Peptide had a week after Jimi to rebutt, but Jimi was given unlimited time. Now, tkster has followed up Peptide's post by saying:

"Well there was NO time limit for the rebuttals, so I am somewhat surprised Peptide posted so quickly. Nonetheless, it is now Jimi's turn. This topic is locked as Jimi can add to it and remove this post when done."

Is this correct-- was Peptide given unlimited time? Or did tkster change the rules on us?
Go to Top of Page

tomk80
SFN Regular

Netherlands
1278 Posts

Posted - 11/04/2004 :  07:44:55   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit tomk80's Homepage Send tomk80 a Private Message
I am not sure. I recall reading the one week for a rebuttal also, but I never saved the posts on my own computer or anywhere else so I can't be sure.

Tom

`Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.'
-Through the Looking Glass by Lewis Caroll-
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26031 Posts

Posted - 11/04/2004 :  22:35:15   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
tkster's latest behaviour is reflective of his inconsistency, as has already been discussed around here.

From this debate:
Well there was NO time limit for the rebuttals, so I am somewhat surprised Peptide posted so quickly.
From the discussion of another pending debate:
The rebuttal round, the evolutionist goes first, of course, with the Creationist following - but no dates are set on it, as rebuttals shouldn't take too long to do. The hardest part of a debate is presenting the argument because you don't know what to pick, whereas with a rebuttal, you know what you will be dealing with.
So, if it takes a week to do the "hardest part," tkster being suprised at all that a rebuttal was done in another week is surprising, itself.

By the way, I also remember a one-week rebuttal limit for this debate, but failed to copy it off, and tkster edits the "rules" posts quite often:
Last edited by tkster on Sun Oct 31, 2004 4:08 am; edited 7 times in total
This isn't surprising.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Hawks
SFN Regular

Canada
1383 Posts

Posted - 11/05/2004 :  01:21:26   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Hawks's Homepage Send Hawks a Private Message
I seem to remember that old web pages are logged somewhere and can be re-retrieved. I'll try to find out.

METHINKS IT IS LIKE A WEASEL
It's a small, off-duty czechoslovakian traffic warden!
Go to Top of Page

Hawks
SFN Regular

Canada
1383 Posts

Posted - 11/05/2004 :  01:39:43   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Hawks's Homepage Send Hawks a Private Message
You can try www.archive.org. I'd do it myself, but I'm not sure on exactly which web page the time limit for the rebuttal is, and I really need to go to bed.

METHINKS IT IS LIKE A WEASEL
It's a small, off-duty czechoslovakian traffic warden!
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 11/05/2004 :  07:02:50   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Dave W.
[By the way, I also remember a one-week rebuttal limit for this debate, but failed to copy it off, and tkster edits the "rules" posts quite often:
Last edited by tkster on Sun Oct 31, 2004 4:08 am; edited 7 times in total
This isn't surprising.



I noticed that, too. The problem I now have is that if one (or both) of the debators have unlimited time to rebutt, how/when does the debate end? do we need to check back daily in hopes that Jimi will have replied?

The whole thing seems more and more like a sham-- especially now that Jimi's arguments have been destroyed to the point where he can't attack evolution without attacking his own (illegally made) earlier arguments against it! I doubt we'll ever see the debate concluded.
Go to Top of Page

mountain_hare
New Member

13 Posts

Posted - 11/07/2004 :  01:03:43   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send mountain_hare a Private Message
LOL. I'd love to see the private convo's between tkster and jimi.

Jimi: "Code red! Oh God, I was just torn to shreds. I need help, tkster!"
Tkster: "Don't blaspheme! That's against the rules of this forum! Oh, wait, you're not an atheist. Carry on!"
Jimi: "Erm, yeahhhh. Anyway, can you pull some strings so that I can have an unfai.. errm, I mean perfectly fair advantage in this debate?"
Tkster: *mutters to self* "Bloody moron. He's a moderator, but too inept to edit the rules. *sighs* Oh well, I'd better do it myself!"
Tkster: "Jimi, have you typed up your reply?"
Jimi: "Err, I'm just going out the back to get it!" *footsteps, and a car screeching*.
Tkster: "Umm, yeah. Where was I? Oh yes, unlimited debate time for Jimi!"

To be continued... in 100 years time!

"This may sound really off the wall, but listen to me. You've got to believe me. I've not gone crazy, and I'm not fooling around. At first I thought I was losing my mind. But now I know I'm not. It's not me. The scientific community. It's being invaded by Creationism. Someone's ignorant delusions come to life. Little by little, the
invasion is spreading. Trying to swallow up everything in ignorance."

The words of Dr. Harry to the disbelieving scientific community, who were amazed that such idiotic ideals as "Creationism" would ever be taken seriously.
Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9696 Posts

Posted - 11/07/2004 :  04:14:02   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Dave W.
By the way, I also remember a one-week rebuttal limit for this debate, but failed to copy it off, and tkster edits the "rules" posts quite often:
Last edited by tkster on Sun Oct 31, 2004 4:08 am; edited 7 times in total
This isn't surprising.

If I'm not mistaken, at least in Snitz-forums, editing a post is a way to bump the thread. This could be the reason tkster is editing the post. Though it would have been easier making it a sticky.

The Skeptic Times forum is not powered by Snitz though, and when I edited a post in a thread it was not bumped, but it could work for admins.

Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Edited by - Dr. Mabuse on 11/07/2004 04:20:14
Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 11/10/2004 :  07:11:41   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message
Well, Jimi's now had a week and just over four days to write and post something-- not counting the week he had while Peptide composed his rebuttal-- but thus far, nothing new has been posted to the debate thread over at SkepticTimes.

Looks like we're never going to get a reply, nor will a winner ever be declared. And I'm suspecting that this "out" was created from the start, as tkster set everything up so a) Jimi would go last, and b) he'd have unlimited time. Now Jimi saves face, and the whole gang doesn't have to admit that they should abandon their creationist stance.

I regret now that we (even though I didn't really participate in setting the ground rules!) didn't push for some sort of time limit, even if it were as long as four or five weeks for Jimi...
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13481 Posts

Posted - 11/10/2004 :  07:45:35   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message
quote:
Cuneiformist
Looks like we're never going to get a reply, nor will a winner ever be declared. And I'm suspecting that this "out" was created from the start, as tkster set everything up so a) Jimi would go last, and b) he'd have unlimited time. Now Jimi saves face, and the whole gang doesn't have to admit that they should abandon their creationist stance.

Naaaa. You give these guys too much credit. They shoot from the hip. I think tkster did change the rules to accommodate Jimi, but it was not done with any plan in mind. It's just incompetence coupled with an incomplete ethical compass. Fact is, on their radio show, they joked about how easy it will be to rebut peptides arguments. (I'm too lazy to get that link.)
I don't know if the radio show was recorded before or after peptides rebuttal.

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 17 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.09 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000