Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Community Forums
 General Discussion
 Where IS Everyone?
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 5

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 12/28/2004 :  16:16:37   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
Hi, dv82matt. Glad to see you getting your feet wet at last.

As Plyss has stated, don't worry about lame. We all do a lame one once in a while.

Looking forward to your input.


"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

dv82matt
SFN Regular

760 Posts

Posted - 12/31/2004 :  10:12:59   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send dv82matt a Private Message
Thanks for the warm welcome.
Go to Top of Page

thecor
New Member

Italy
27 Posts

Posted - 01/01/2005 :  01:10:40   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send thecor a Private Message
As an infrequent visitor who rarely posts anymore, I think I can address the why posed by Cuneiformist at the start of this thread: For me, the answer is Time. To become involved with debates on this site one has to be prepared to dedicate a great deal of time to substantiate any claims or concepts. I find it difficult to justify this expenditure as I still have to work for a living; am raising two teenage girls, as well wishing to read some 10,000 more books before I die. I beleive that there are some very intelligent and informed people on this site who contribute to my quest for knowledge, so I continue to "lurk" gleaning what I can.
Go to Top of Page

satans_mom
Skeptic Friend

USA
148 Posts

Posted - 01/02/2005 :  23:17:04   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send satans_mom an AOL message  Send satans_mom a Yahoo! Message Send satans_mom a Private Message
Hey, you know I just realized this..........

I am still here. Although, half-assedly active, I'm still here.

The numbers will grow in the years to come.

Yo mama's so fat, she's on both sides of the family.

Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 01/22/2005 :  00:23:18   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by me

Would anyone like to do a "mark-recapture" study on the SFN membership, to see how many folks are really active?
Okay, so I finally got off my butt and did the first half of the necessary work for this. If someone can remind me to do the second half in two weeks or a month, it'd be much appreciated.

We can do two related mark-recapture studies here. One for how many people log on, whether they post or not, and the other for how many active posters we've got.

To appease your curiosity (since I know you so well), on just January 21st, 2005, we had 45 members log on, and 35 members post. If he's feeling froggy, @tomic may be able to tell us how many total visitors we had on the same date, and/or the number of Webpage loads.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 02/04/2005 :  23:35:12   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
Okay, folks. After a two-week period and a "recapture," I ran the Petersen Method of estimating population sizes, and came up with the following results.

Visitors: A 'visitor' is defined as an SFN member who logged in on one of the two capture days (Jan 21 and Feb 4). Note well that I have no quick-and-easy way to track members who don't log in, nor can I track non-members who are just lurking. According to the data and my calculations, we have approximately 57 regular visitors, with a 95% confidence interval (CI) of 48 to 88 members.

Posters: A 'poster' is defined as an SFN member who made at least one post on one of the two capture days. According to the data and my calculations, we have approximately 48 active posters, with a 95% CI of 38 to 70.

Yes, there's a rather large uncertainty in both numbers, as (unfortunately) our sample sizes are small. And, strangely, there was a rather dramatic drop in visitors (29%) and posters (46%) between the Jan 21 and Feb 4 capture dates. Perhaps many of our regulars are wallowing in depression following the State of the Union.

No matter what, our recapture rates for both measures were very high. For example, of the 19 people who posted on Feb 4, 14 of them also posted on Jan 21, for a rate of nearly 74%. Most of the examples I've seen for estimating population sizes work with a rate of about 10%, so the method being used may be completely inappropriate.

I'm not sure, I'm just playing with numbers, here. Perhaps I should do this again in a few months, or better yet in the summertime.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

H. Humbert
SFN Die Hard

USA
4574 Posts

Posted - 02/05/2005 :  04:04:20   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send H. Humbert a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Dave W.
Visitors: A 'visitor' is defined as an SFN member who logged in on one of the two capture days (Jan 21 and Feb 4). Note well that I have no quick-and-easy way to track members who don't log in, nor can I track non-members who are just lurking.
What about people who are already logged in? I don't normally log out when I leave; I just rely on the cookies to remember who I am the next day. Would that still count?

"A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes

"The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman

"Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
Edited by - H. Humbert on 02/05/2005 04:04:57
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 02/05/2005 :  09:56:45   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
You're counted, H, in all four sets of data. I can't, however, claim knowledge of whether a person who stayed logged in but did not post would count as a visitor.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

beskeptigal
SFN Die Hard

USA
3834 Posts

Posted - 02/05/2005 :  12:57:52   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send beskeptigal a Private Message
Interesting work, Dave. It might be worthwhile to look at a small random sample of regular posters and see if they average daily, every 2 days...etc posts. That might give some insight if two capture days were enough.
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26022 Posts

Posted - 02/05/2005 :  14:17:07   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
One of the assumptions of the Petersen method is that every animal has an equal chance of being caught. Obviously, this won't be the case when some people post numerous times every day, while others post only once a week. But I figure that by not capturing on a big holiday, the odds that any particular person would visit and/or post would be about the same as always, and I didn't have much of a choice in terms of the day-of-week ('cause I had to stay up until nearly two AM - and I cheated a bit on the recapture, but lucked out in that nobody else showed up before server midnight).

By the way, all the data I used I got from the member list, so if anyone else would like to track different data, be my guest.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 5 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.14 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000