Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Politics
 Iraq Elections
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Chippewa
SFN Regular

USA
1496 Posts

Posted - 01/30/2005 :  03:16:03  Show Profile  Visit Chippewa's Homepage Send Chippewa a Private Message
The Iraqi people appear proud and happy to be voting at last. George Bush of course is going to take some credit for their democracy-in-action. This is speculation on my part, but the irony at first seemed to be that the Whitehouse would be hopeful that Iraq elects what is (for Iraq) a liberal regime, because a conservative regime would become in essence, Iran - Part 2, a theocracy. (That's the irony as the present Whitehouse is a neoconservative regime, and a want-to-be theocracy.)

But then again, if the Washington D.C. Neocons are anxious to attack Iran, (and they have been spying potential targets there,) they might be thinking that continued violence or civil war in Iraq will be tied to Iran. That may be true, but the Neocons will likely use that as one of their excuses for war, just as they were able to tie the Iraq war to the very evil and real Saddam dictatorship, and in turn, it to false links to the terrorist attacks and nonexistent WMDs.

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 01/30/2005 :  03:31:13   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
We'll know how it comes out soon -- it's 5:30 AM, too early for me to speculate.

Edited to add this.
quote:

By Matt Spetalnick
BAGHDAD (Reuters) - Insurgents threatened a bloodbath on Sunday when Iraqis go to the polls in an election intended to unite the country and quell violence but which could instead foment sectarian strife.

Iraq was under security lockdown for Iraq's first multi-party elections in nearly half a century.

Borders were sealed, airports closed and only official vehicles allowed on the streets after heavy bloodshed on the eve of voting, including a bold rocket strike that killed two Americans at the U.S. embassy compound in Baghdad's Green Zone.

Insurgents also killed 17 Iraqis and an American soldier on Saturday.

I dunno, Chip. I am hopeful, but not optomistic.




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Edited by - filthy on 01/30/2005 03:51:18
Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9687 Posts

Posted - 01/30/2005 :  04:58:29   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Chippewa

The Iraqi people appear proud and happy to be voting at last.
In Sweden 100'000+ Iraqi exiles have voted absentee.

One of the evening papers over here interviewed a bunch of Bagdad citizens: a third of them said "ofcourse I'll be voting", one third said "I won't be voting: not enough security at voting station" and the final third said either "I don't know anything about the candidates" or "it won't make a difference".

quote:
That may be true, but the Neocons will likely use that as one of their excuses for war, just as they were able to tie the Iraq war to the very evil and real Saddam dictatorship, and in turn, it to false links to the terrorist attacks and nonexistent WMDs.

Well, WMD worked once, didn't it? It could work again.

The biggest difference between Iran and Iraq right now is that Iran actually have a moderatly working democracy, such as it is. Including a voting tradition among it's citizens.
Saddam was an evil despot, but Iran has an elected congress. Candidates to that congress have to be approved by the mullahs, and I think the mullahs have veto on all decitions made. If the mullahs are removed, Iran would actually be quite democratic compared to it's neighbours.

Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.19 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000