|  |  |  | 
| furshurSFN Regular
 
  
USA1536 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 04/06/2006 :  12:52:45     
 |  
           	| This is an interesting writeup in the journal Nature (pdf. format). 
 quote:From the article:
 The disk resembles protoplanetary disks seen around ordinary young stars6, suggesting the possibility of planet formation around young neutron stars.
 
 
 EDITED because the link does not appear to be working!
 Go  here and enter disk neutron star planet into the search and the article should be in the first page of articles.
 
 
 |  
| If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know.
 |  
| Edited by - furshur on 04/06/2006  18:15:03
 |  | 
| Dr. MabuseSeptic Fiend
 
  
Sweden9698 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 04/06/2006 :  13:34:33   [Permalink]       
 |  
| It's interesting that accretion disks has been observed, with protoplanet formation. 
 Actually, the very first exo-planets ever discovered (by inference) were planets around pulsars. The planet's gravitational pull on the pulsar creates small but regular distortions in the pulsar's time-base.
 This was in 1992.
 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PSR_1257%2B12
 |  
| Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
 Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3
 
 "Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse
 
 Support American Troops in Iraq:
 Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
 Collateralmurder.
 |  
|  |  | 
| Michael MozinaSFN Regular
 
  
1647 Posts | 
|  Posted - 04/06/2006 :  16:43:12   [Permalink]       
 |  
| Hmm, where did I hear that theory about a protostar and protoplanets forming from a supernova remnant?  Oh ya.... 
 http://spaceflightnow.com/news/n0201/10ironsun/
 
 
 quote:Manuel says the solar system was born catastrophically out of a supernova -- a theory that goes against the widely-held belief among astrophysicists that the sun and planets were formed 4.5 billion years ago in a relatively ambiguous cloud of interstellar dust.
 
 
 :)
 |  
| Edited by - Michael Mozina on 04/06/2006  16:44:10 |  
|  |  | 
| Dr. MabuseSeptic Fiend
 
  
Sweden9698 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 04/06/2006 :  17:45:17   [Permalink]       
 |  
| Right... 
 And how deep is the atmopsphere of a neutron star?
 How strong is the magnetic field of a neutron star?
 What's the density of a white dwarf?
 |  
| Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
 Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3
 
 "Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse
 
 Support American Troops in Iraq:
 Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
 Collateralmurder.
 |  
|  |  | 
| furshurSFN Regular
 
  
USA1536 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 04/06/2006 :  18:09:39   [Permalink]     
 |  
| Michael wrote: 
 quote:Hmm, where did I hear that theory about a protostar and protoplanets forming from a supernova remnant? Oh ya....
 
 This is article is not about a protostar, try at least to adress the actual article and quit injecting your pseudoscience into it.
 
 
 |  
| If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know.
 |  
|  |  | 
| furshurSFN Regular
 
  
USA1536 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 04/06/2006 :  18:20:57   [Permalink]     
 |  
| quote:Actually, the very first exo-planets ever discovered (by inference) were planets around pulsars. The planet's gravitational pull on the pulsar creates small but regular distortions in the pulsar's time-base.
 
 Right Dr. Mabuse , I think there was always a question how the bodies got there, and this article concludes that they formed insitu.  A big point of the article is that planets may be even more common than we previously thought.
 |  
| If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know.
 |  
|  |  | 
| Michael MozinaSFN Regular
 
  
1647 Posts | 
|  Posted - 04/07/2006 :  10:26:07   [Permalink]       
 |  
| quote:Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse
 
 Right...
 
 And how deep is the atmopsphere of a neutron star?
 How strong is the magnetic field of a neutron star?
 
 
 I suppose that both of those answers would depend on the *size* of the neutron star.  There tends to be a lower limit where they simply "blow" (about .189 solar masses) and an upper limit where current theory suggests that they form a black hole.
 
 http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9707230
 
 
 quote:What's the density of a white dwarf?
 
 
 How does that idea even apply here?
 |  
|  |  | 
| Michael MozinaSFN Regular
 
  
1647 Posts | 
|  Posted - 04/07/2006 :  10:30:05   [Permalink]       
 |  
| quote:Originally posted by furshur
 
 Michael wrote:
 
 quote:Hmm, where did I hear that theory about a protostar and protoplanets forming from a supernova remnant? Oh ya....
 
 This is article is not about a protostar, try at least to adress the actual article and quit injecting your pseudoscience into it.
 
 
 Excuse me?  This is an article about how a supernova creates a disk around itself that could certainly evolve into planets.  There is nothing to prevent that neutron star from forming a shell and creating a new star assuming that Manuels' theories have merit.  The only thing we *don't see in these images is a hydrogen ball in the middle, but you assume stars are big hydrogen balls anyway.  Talk about psuedoscience.
 |  
|  |  | 
| BigPapaSmurfSFN Die Hard
 
  
3192 Posts | 
|  Posted - 04/07/2006 :  11:35:29   [Permalink]     
 |  
| You are a moron, a high end one, but moronic none the less. |  
| "...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History
 
 "...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book,  De Morte Peregrini
 |  
|  |  | 
| Michael MozinaSFN Regular
 
  
1647 Posts | 
|  Posted - 04/07/2006 :  11:47:00   [Permalink]       
 |  
| quote:Originally posted by BigPapaSmurf
 
 You are a moron, a high end one, but moronic none the less.
 
 
 
 Ah, peanut gallery character smears.  How quaint and unexpected.
  |  
|  |  | 
| furshurSFN Regular
 
  
USA1536 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 04/07/2006 :  12:19:29   [Permalink]     
 |  
| quote:There is nothing to prevent that neutron star from forming a shell and creating a new star
 
 Oh really?  How about physics?  Please demonstrate how this could happen.
 
 quote:assuming that Manuels' theories have merit.
 
 This is a VERY big assumption!
 
 
 
 |  
| If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know.
 |  
|  |  | 
|  |  |  |