Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 Microcephalic redux
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

Starman
SFN Regular

Sweden
1613 Posts

Posted - 08/22/2006 :  00:30:17  Show Profile Send Starman a Private Message
From Carl Zimmer - Return of the Microcephalic Hobbit
Seems like the "not a species" crowd is about to release a paper claiming that 'the hobit' was not a new species but a pygmy human with a genetic defect called microcephaly that gave it a small head.

I must admit that on this issue I feel a bit biased to trust the views of the people who found the bones and against the klutz who damaged them.

NY Times : Report Reignites Feud Over ‘Little People of Flores'

Press release from Penn State - 'No hobbits in this shire'

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 08/22/2006 :  13:21:31   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message
It is an interesting debate, to say the least.

The Penn State team does make a good argument for their case.


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26020 Posts

Posted - 08/22/2006 :  13:58:58   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
What's nice is the demonstration here that scientific debates are argued in the pages of scientific journals, and that even "unpopular" scientific opinions can get published in high-profile journals. Those things are more important than what the actual story behind the "hobbits" is.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

Starman
SFN Regular

Sweden
1613 Posts

Posted - 08/23/2006 :  07:25:20   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Starman a Private Message
More from John Hawks :
Is this the end for Homo floresiensis?
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 08/27/2006 :  14:38:08   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message
It's been a sad month for dwarfs -- both human and planetary examples are getting demoted right and left. This article at Archaeology provides another good read on the Flores controversy. It does look as though the latest study is fairly devastating to Homo floresiensis as a species of hominid.


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

Starman
SFN Regular

Sweden
1613 Posts

Posted - 08/29/2006 :  00:35:47   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Starman a Private Message
Well here you have the full paper, free via Open Access.


I also found an article in the science pages of my local paper (sorry, only Swedish and not published on the web), where a Swedish paleontologist, Lars Werdelin (associate professor, Systematics & Evolution) points out that both Teuku Jacob and Alan Thorn subscribe to the Multiregional hypothesis for which a Homo florensis species would be troublesome. In his opinion the debate has turned to politics.

If another skull was to be found in Liang Bua this would probably settle this debate, but Jacob who has a lot of authority in Indonesia has stopped all further excavation. (He is also accused of damaging LB1)

Werdelin thinks that the skull is easy evaluate and his opinion is that it probably belong to a new species.

Of the arguments listed in the Archaeology article:
  1. Pygmies living in a village near Liang Bua cave where the bones were found display many of the distinctive dental traits used to define the new species.
  2. The hobbit's leg bones are abnormally thick and round, and have very weak muscle attachments, probably indicating some kind of growth disorder.
  3. The "hobbit's" skull is deformed in a way that makes it less symmetrical than a healthy human skull, a strong indicator that the individual suffered from a pathological condition like microcephaly.
  4. The lack of a chin was also used a defining characteristic for Homo floresiensis, but some of the local pygmies also lack chins.
Only the first looks devastating to the species hypothesis to me. Lets see what others may say.
Go to Top of Page

Starman
SFN Regular

Sweden
1613 Posts

Posted - 10/08/2006 :  23:41:04   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Starman a Private Message
Update from Carl Zimmer - Homo Floresiensis: Two Years Out

A summary of the last two years with Flores and the two latest studies, one supporting the new species hypothesis and one supporting microcephaly.
Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 10/08/2006 :  23:54:10   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message
I think the only way the get closer to a good answer in this case is to have some more exploration of the area where the first bones were found.


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.09 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000