Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Religion
 Texas Theopublicans Again
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

R.Wreck
SFN Regular

USA
1191 Posts

Posted - 10/21/2006 :  13:34:49  Show Profile Send R.Wreck a Private Message
The Texas Theopublican Party is at it again. According to them, an athiest shouldn't be able to hold a public office:

quote:
Candidate for the Sixth Court of Appeals, Ben Franks, is reported to be a professed atheist and apparently believes the Bible is a “collection of myths.”

...

All elected or appointed officials in Texas must take the oath prescribed by Art. XVI, Section 1(a) of the Texas Constitution:

"I, _____ , do solemnly swear (or affirm), that I will faithfully execute the duties of the office of _____ of the State of Texas, and will to the best of my ability preserve, protect, and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States and of this State, so help me God."

Should Franks be elected in November, one would have to conclude that he will hold true to his out of touch “atheist” belief system and ignore the laws and Constitution of Texas.



Of course these shitheads would rather ignore the Constitution of the United States which is pretty clear on the issue:

quote:
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.




According to this article from law.com


quote:
Franks says he's not bothered by the allegation.

"I'm very much an advocate for separation of church and state," Franks says. "In that context, it offends me when people wear their religion on their sleeves."

But, Franks adds, "my religious preferences are my private business. That's not the business of anybody else."




Once again the Texas Theopublicans don't even pretend to represent anyone but those operating under the same superstitious delusions as themselves.

The foundation of morality is to . . . give up pretending to believe that for which there is no evidence, and repeating unintelligible propositions about things beyond the possibliities of knowledge.
T. H. Huxley

The Cattle Prod of Enlightened Compassion

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 10/21/2006 :  15:59:44   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message
Incredible, seeing such religious bigotry from the official Texas Republican Party. What a pack of theonazi scum!

And the numb-skull stupidity of the article! Aside from the adolescent, ungrammatical use of quotation marks around "atheist" as an ignorant person's form of emphasis, their reproduction of the oath itself totally destroys their implied argument that an atheist couldn't be sworn in like a "normal" (Christian) person: "I, _____ , do solemnly swear (or affirm)..."

That form of oath, with its "affirming" option, is still standard throughout the US. It is the embodiment and application of Article VI, Clause 3, of the US Constitution. It's there not only to protect people like Franks from the abuse of religious test, but also because some fundamentalist Christians believe that "swearing" by God is forbidden by the Bible, and is "using the name of God in vain."

These God's Own Petrobux boys in Texas (and from Texas) are growing more fascistic by the day. Thank Darwin they're so stupid that they are inadvertently alienating other fudamentalists.


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

beskeptigal
SFN Die Hard

USA
3834 Posts

Posted - 10/21/2006 :  17:29:34   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send beskeptigal a Private Message
More history re-writing. If "so help me God" is there because at the time, that was a common wording of an oath, it doesn't mean it was a purposeful, conscious intent to have the God requirement for the office holder.

It's interesting though, I went to a Democratic Party meeting the other day. It was a collection of dinosaurs and a few local political activists (in other words the people who stay involved in local affairs). I picture the people who attend the Texas meetings that the platform writing occurs at to be a group of Evangelicals who don't represent the actual majority of Republicans even in Texas. But the majority are not the people who attend the Party meetings. We really need to change that in the Democratic Party as well.
Edited by - beskeptigal on 10/21/2006 17:30:08
Go to Top of Page

Orwellingly Yurz
SFN Regular

USA
529 Posts

Posted - 10/21/2006 :  22:36:11   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Orwellingly Yurz a Private Message
YO: This bullshit doesn't ever seem to stop. Evangelical Christians and fundamentalists of other religions find it very difficult to believe that some human beings can live decent, caring lives without having faith or fear in/of God. Believing in living a good life and being good to others can be ways that are chosen, not out of fear of going to hell, but simply because they're just the thing to do. It's so simple, it can be confounding for some. If people who think all atheists are evil or bad would really put their mind to the essence of what Grace is, they could see this as real truth. Doing good without expectation of anything in return is the fundamental element of Christianity, according to Jesus of Nazareth. It surely is amazing when one receives it or gives it. It's enough to make a person believe that they're might be a God. OY!

"The modern conservative...is engaged in one of man's oldest exercises in moral philosophy. That is the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness."
--John Kenneth Galbraith

If dogs run free
Then what must be,
Must be...
And that is all
--Bob Dylan

The neo-cons have gotten welfare for themselves down to a fine art.
--me

"The meek shall inherit the earth, but not the mineral rights."
--J. Paul Getty

"The great thing about Art isn't what it give us, but what we become through it."
--Oscar Wilde

"We have Art in order not to die of life."
--Albert Camus

"I cling like a miser to the freedom I lose when surrounded by an abundance of things."
--Albert Camus

"Experience is the name so many people give to their mistakes."
--Oscar Wilde
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.17 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000