|  |  | 
| StarmanSFN Regular
 
  
Sweden1613 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 10/02/2006 :  23:54:33     
 |  
           	| Evolution News & Views - The State of Scientific Research on Intelligent Design quote:Poor persecuted ID-iots. So brave, so devoted, so ...
 
 I keep getting asked about the scientific research projects underway that relate to Darwinism and intelligent design. So why aren't we talking more about them publicly? For several good reasons:
 
 The most important is that the Darwinist establishment would like nothing better than to "out" research programs before they are finished. The idea is to shut down damaging evidence as early as possible. Strangle the infant in the crib. Demand answers now to questions still being explored.
 
 Paranoia? Hardly. There are too many examples of ID scientists and other scholars who have been hassled and harassed by the Darwinist Inquisition. (I include in the Inquisition those supposed science writers who long ago became propaganda agents rather than serious reporters.)
 ...
 We know of a lot that is happening, and it's exciting. As for the rest, we'll report it when it's ready, not before.
 
 
   |  
| "Any religion that makes a form of torture into an icon that they worship seems to me a pretty sick sort of religion quite honestly"
 -- Terry Jones
 |  | 
| H. HumbertSFN Die Hard
 
  
USA4574 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 10/03/2006 :  00:15:14   [Permalink]     
 |  
| Ah, but the best quote is this: 
 quote:Scientists are under no obligation to report on their work before it's ready, unless of course one has already spent millions of dollars trying to get that "work" into textbooks and classrooms. I guess in ID-Land no research actually has to be in a presentable state before you're allowed to make sweeping claims of overturning scientific paradigms.As for foes and critics who pester us for information about research now underway and who insinuate that, unless we oblige them, we must accept their opinion that such research is not happening, we owe them nothing. Since when does a scientist have to "report" on his work to the public before he is ready?
 
  
 How these jokers are still able to dupe anyone is beyond my comprehension.
 
 
 |  
| "A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes
 
 "The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman
 
 "Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
 |  
| Edited by - H. Humbert on 10/03/2006  00:16:06 |  
|  |  | 
| filthySFN Die Hard
 
  
USA14408 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 10/03/2006 :  02:32:12   [Permalink]     
 |  
| Research on Intelligent Design.... It's rather a contradiction in terms, isn't it? 
 To actually do such a study, they must first establish a designer; any designer. If such can't be found, they have nothing to base their inquery on. Thus far, the Designer seems to remain somewhere in the Realms of Rhetoric, as does the research.
 
 C'mon fellas, put up or shut up. Whadda ya got? Where's the beef?
 
 
  
 
 |  
| "What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)
 
 "If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres
 
 
 "The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude
 
 Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,
 
 and Crypto-Communist!
   
 
 |  
|  |  | 
| StarmanSFN Regular
 
  
Sweden1613 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 10/03/2006 :  03:48:38   [Permalink]     
 |  
| quote:Stop being such an evidenco-fascist, filthy!C'mon fellas, put up or shut up. Whadda ya got? Where's the beef?
 
 
 You also know perfectly well that ID is not about the nature of the  designer. Its not that kind of theory. I
 |  
| "Any religion that makes a form of torture into an icon that they worship seems to me a pretty sick sort of religion quite honestly"
 -- Terry Jones
 |  
|  |  | 
| JohnOASSFN Regular
 
  
Australia800 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 10/03/2006 :  05:04:02   [Permalink]       
 |  
| quote:Originally posted by Starman
 Stop being such an evidenco-fascist, filthy!
 
 You also know perfectly well that ID is not about the nature of the  designer. Its not that kind of theory. I
 
 
 
 Do you think Starman's post was cut off by the proverbial lightning bolt from above?
 
 Of course the supreme being would find it funny to click "post" afterwards.
 
 |  
| John's just this guy, you know.
 |  
|  |  | 
| RickySFN Die Hard
 
  
USA4907 Posts
 |  | 
| plecoSFN Addict
 
  
USA2998 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 10/03/2006 :  08:33:37   [Permalink]       
 |  
| "In our lab lesson today, we will get a pile of dirt and some water and wait for it to transmogrify into something alive.  We must make sure that we exclude all possibly natural causes for the transmogrification.  If something happens, it must be the designer.  If nothing happens, then it is because the designer didn't want it to happen." 
 That's REAL science.
 |  
| 
 | by Filthy The neo-con methane machine will soon be running at full fart.
 | 
 |  
|  |  | 
| CuneiformistThe Imperfectionist
 
  
USA4955 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 10/03/2006 :  08:43:20   [Permalink]     
 |  
| quote:I know, Ricky! I asked this a long time ago-- how, exactly, does one teach ID? The first few minutes would be spent saying stuff like "See this? It's irreducubly complex. It had to have had a designer." Then there'd be a few minutes of speculation. "The designer could be an alien. Or perhaps an extra-dimensional being. Or perhaps-- perhaps a supernatural being. Like God."Originally posted by Ricky
 
 I'm curious as to what an ID lesson would look like:
 
 "Intelligent Design is a theory which says that somewhere, at sometime, at some place, there was something, which did something to create or help create life."
 
 After that, what the hell could you ever teach about ID that isn't a criticism of evolution?
 
 
 
 But that would be it. If a student asked "Can we figure out who the designer is?" the answer has to be "Nope." And if a student asked "How do we know what is[i/] irreducibly complex and what [i]isn't irreducibly comples, but only looks like it is because we haven't figured it out, yet?" the answer has to be "Uhhhh...."
 
 This is particularly the case as long as the IDers pretend that they're "still working" on their theory and won't offer anything about it until it's done.
 |  
|  |  | 
| HalfMoonerDingaling
 
  
Philippines15831 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 10/03/2006 :  16:24:12   [Permalink]     
 |  
| That's a pretty good approach by the IDers, from a purely propaganda viewpoint.  After all, they cannot even begin to do any science about their "designer," it being impossible to define the designer or design an experiment or other valid scientific research approach (notwithstanding pleco's brilliant dirt and water win-win "experiment"). 
 So they instead say the problem's with the evil "Darwinist" scientists, who are suppressing their "scientific research."  Clever!  When you've got nothing to defend, attack!
 
 
 |  
| “Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.”  —HalfMooner
 Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
 |  
|  |  | 
| moakleySFN Regular
 
  
USA1888 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 10/03/2006 :  16:38:20   [Permalink]     
 |  
| It is interesting since just last week we learned that Darwinism is Dead according to Jonathan Wells.  If they can't do any significant ID research or get any one to sign on to do any significant ID research, could it be that Wells may have been a bit premature with his prediction. 
 I suspect that Wells may have been shoving food up his butt again.
 |  
| Life is good
 
 Philosophy is questions that may never be answered.  Religion is answers that may never be questioned. -Anonymous
 |  
|  |  | 
| chaloobiSFN Regular
 
  
1620 Posts | 
|  Posted - 10/04/2006 :  09:20:00   [Permalink]       
 |  
| quote:So much for scientific transparency.Originally posted by Starman
 
 Evolution News & Views - The State of Scientific Research on Intelligent Design
 quote:Poor persecuted ID-iots. So brave, so devoted, so ...
 
 I keep getting asked about the scientific research projects underway that relate to Darwinism and intelligent design. So why aren't we talking more about them publicly? For several good reasons:
 
 The most important is that the Darwinist establishment would like nothing better than to "out" research programs before they are finished. The idea is to shut down damaging evidence as early as possible. Strangle the infant in the crib. Demand answers now to questions still being explored.
 
 Paranoia? Hardly. There are too many examples of ID scientists and other scholars who have been hassled and harassed by the Darwinist Inquisition. (I include in the Inquisition those supposed science writers who long ago became propaganda agents rather than serious reporters.)
 ...
 We know of a lot that is happening, and it's exciting. As for the rest, we'll report it when it's ready, not before.
 
 
  
 
  |  
| -Chaloobi
 
 
 |  
|  |  | 
| chaloobiSFN Regular
 
  
1620 Posts | 
|  Posted - 10/04/2006 :  09:22:10   [Permalink]       
 |  
| quote:Perhaps he was raptured up.  Know of anyone else that's gone missing suddenly?Originally posted by JohnOAS
 
 
 quote:Originally posted by Starman
 Stop being such an evidenco-fascist, filthy!
 
 You also know perfectly well that ID is not about the nature of the  designer. Its not that kind of theory. I
 
 
 
 Do you think Starman's post was cut off by the proverbial lightning bolt from above?
 
 Of course the supreme being would find it funny to click "post" afterwards.
 
 
 
 |  
| -Chaloobi
 
 
 |  
|  |  | 
| JohnOASSFN Regular
 
  
Australia800 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 10/05/2006 :  19:11:57   [Permalink]       
 |  
| quote:Originally posted by chaloobi
 
 
 quote:Perhaps he was raptured up.  Know of anyone else that's gone missing suddenly?Originally posted by JohnOAS
 
 Do you think Starman's post was cut off by the proverbial lightning bolt from above?
 
 Of course the supreme being would find it funny to click "post" afterwards.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 No, I just can't bring myself to believe that that could possibly ha
 |  
| John's just this guy, you know.
 |  
|  |  | 
| plecoSFN Addict
 
  
USA2998 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 10/05/2006 :  19:56:48   [Permalink]       
 |  
| Here may be found the last words of Joseph of Arimathea. He who is valiant and pure of spirit may find the Holy Grail in the Castle of aaaaaaggghh 
 |  
| 
 | by Filthy The neo-con methane machine will soon be running at full fart.
 | 
 |  
|  |  | 
| H. HumbertSFN Die Hard
 
  
USA4574 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 10/05/2006 :  20:05:21   [Permalink]     
 |  
| If he was dying he wouldn't bother to carve "aaaaggghhh," he'd just say it! * 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 * Perhaps he was dictating.
 |  
| "A man is his own easiest dupe, for what he wishes to be true he generally believes to be true." --Demosthenes
 
 "The first principle is that you must not fool yourself - and you are the easiest person to fool." --Richard P. Feynman
 
 "Face facts with dignity." --found inside a fortune cookie
 |  
|  |  | 
| plecoSFN Addict
 
  
USA2998 Posts
 | 
|  Posted - 10/05/2006 :  20:19:16   [Permalink]       
 |  
| Can't wait for the new release of MPatHG...I hope there are lots o' goodies.  Apparently it is now in the proper aspect ratio.  Perhaps I will get this for me birthday (which is in 2 days). |  
| 
 | by Filthy The neo-con methane machine will soon be running at full fart.
 | 
 |  
|  |  | 
                
|  |  |