Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 General Skepticism
 A flying saucer design
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 3

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26021 Posts

Posted - 03/08/2007 :  15:31:31   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message  Reply with Quote
quote:
Originally posted by Dr. Mabuse

Bolding mine. Shouldn't that be Energy?
Power is measured in Watts, Energy is Joule (Watts*second)

Yes, energy.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

furshur
SFN Regular

USA
1536 Posts

Posted - 03/08/2007 :  19:07:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send furshur a Private Message  Reply with Quote
So carrying on this useless endeavor:

This is the work of compressing the gas (in N-m) to raise the bell:

W = Pf x Vf x ln(Vf/Vi)

Pf = 100m of water + atomspheric pressure = 1081738.91 N/m^2 (pa)
Vf = 8m^3. (10,000 kg Bell / 1000kg/m^3 water) - 2 m^3 water displaced by the empty bell.
Vi = 85m^3 PiVi = PfVf Vi = PfVf/Pi (1 atm)

W = 1081738 N/m^2 * 85 m^3 * ln[8/85] Note the ln will yield a negative.
W = -20,451,007 N-m The work is negative because work must be done to compress the air.

Now the bell raises majestically to the surface of the water. Well we actually need just a tad more air to make it more than nuetrally boyant.
At this point the bell is chocked full of PE as shown-

PE = G * m * H

G = 9.81 m/s/s
m = 10,000 kg
H = 100 m

PE = 9,810,000 N-m This is positive because this is available work or energy.

The energy balance is 9,810,000 N-m + (-20,451,007 N-m) =
-10641007 N-m

Why the huge deficit? A lot of the Potential Energy we put into the bell is still available. That is why as klaudio stated the bell will accelerate as the bell rises converting the energy of the compressed gas to KE.

I am getting kicked off the computer I will have to discuss this later.




If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know.
Go to Top of Page

Ghost_Skeptic
SFN Regular

Canada
510 Posts

Posted - 03/09/2007 :  01:35:14   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Ghost_Skeptic a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Furshur - are you assuming adiabatic (no heat loss) or isothermal compression - if the compression is rapid (like the comprssion stroke in an internal combustion energy), it will be nearly adiabatic (temperature of the air will increase as it is compressed) - not that this will make the thing work.

"You can lead a horse to water but you can't make him drink. / You can send a kid to college but you can't make him think." - B.B. King

History is made by stupid people - The Arrogant Worms

"The greater the ignorance the greater the dogmatism." - William Osler

"Religion is the natural home of the psychopath" - Pat Condell

"The day will come when the mystical generation of Jesus, by the supreme being as his father in the womb of a virgin, will be classed with the fable of the generation of Minerva in the brain of Jupiter" - Thomas Jefferson
Edited by - Ghost_Skeptic on 03/09/2007 06:51:18
Go to Top of Page

furshur
SFN Regular

USA
1536 Posts

Posted - 03/09/2007 :  12:14:04   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send furshur a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Ghost, I am assuming isothermal. I agree that adiabatic is closer to reality, but I chose the this case because it looks like Kaudio was trying to use the isothermal case - besides it is easier to calculate the work if you choose the isothermal route. Hopefully I can play around with this over the weekend, work has got me hopping pretty good.

This is such an extremely inefficient process that I think you could make about any assumptions and could still not get it above 50% efficient.


If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 3 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.08 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000