|
|
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26020 Posts |
 Posted - 06/24/2007 : 19:16:05 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME
Kil, the information was presented to show the amount of shooters on drugs. If you notice I put the VT shooting in the non drug side of the equation, meaning that I was not counting it as a drug shooting.
|
Ah, you were making a joke. 61 killed minus Cho equals 60 killed. But all the people he murdered apparently still count.
And you're still wrong, in both your original assertion and your math. |
- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too. |
 |
|
|
JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED
2418 Posts |
Posted - 06/27/2007 : 22:55:50 [Permalink]
|
Dave, I discontinued this topic because any evidence I present will be discounted and a topic of death does not interest me that much. In fact the revel in the glory that the blacksburg murders were done without drugs is rather sick.
|
What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell |
|
|
|
Dave W.
Info Junkie
USA
26020 Posts |
Posted - 06/27/2007 : 23:15:54 [Permalink]
|
Originally posted by JEROME DA GNOME
Dave, I discontinued this topic because any evidence I present will be discounted and a topic of death does not interest me that much. In fact the revel in the glory that the blacksburg murders were done without drugs is rather sick. |
Wow. What a fantasy-laden set of rationalizations you've created for not admitting that one of the bald claims that you made voluntarily was factually incorrect.
In fact, none of the evidence you've presented has been discounted, it's been accounted for. In fact, nobody has glorified Cho's horrific actions, the fact that he wasn't on psychiatric drugs is being pointed out to demonstrate that other people's conclusions (including yours) about those drugs (not about Cho or the horror he created) are incorrect. |
- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too. |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
Sorry Travolta, Cho not on drugs...
