Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Politics
 Good Old Bill, the Liberal Hero
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 08/09/2007 :  11:56:30  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message
The Clinton scam
is symptomatic of the death of liberalism – not its narcissistic, war-loving wing ("humanitarian intervention"), which is ascendant, but the liberalism that speaks against crimes committed in its name, while extending rungs of the economic ladder to those below. It was Clinton's promotion of the former and crushing of the latter that so inspired new Labour's "project." Clinton, not Bush, was Cool Britannia's true Mafia godfather. Keen observers of Tony Blair will recall that during one of his many farewell speeches, the sociopath did a weird impersonation of Clinton's head wiggle.

Clinton is able to make a shedload a money because he is contrasted with the despised Bush as the flawed good guy who did his best for the world and brought economic boom to the US – the fabled American dream no less. Both notions are finely spun lies. What Clinton and Blair have most in common is that they are the most violent leaders of their countries in the modern era; that includes Bush. Consider Clinton's true record:

In 1993, he pursued George H. W. Bush's invasion of Somalia. He invaded Haiti in 1994. He bombed Bosnia in 1995 and Serbia in 1999. In 1998, he bombed Afghanistan; and, at the height of his Monica Lewinsky troubles, he momentarily diverted the headline writers to a major "terrorist target" in Sudan that he ordered destroyed with an onslaught of missiles. It turned out to be sub-Saharan Africa's largest pharmaceutical plant, the only source of chloroquine, the treatment for malaria, and other drugs that were lifelines to hundreds of thousands. As a result, wrote Jonathan Belke, then of the Near East Foundation, "tens of thousands of people – many of them children – have suffered and died from malaria, tuberculosis and other treatable diseases."

Long before Shock and Awe, Clinton was destroying and killing in Iraq. Under the lawless pretense of a "no-fly zone," he oversaw the longest allied aerial bombardment since the Second World War. This was hardly reported. At the same time, he imposed and tightened a Washington-led economic siege estimated to have killed a million civilians. "We think the price is worth it," said his secretary of state, Madeleine Albright, in an exquisite moment of honesty.


I know the rent is in arrears
The dog has not been fed in years
It's even worse than it appears
But it's alright-
Jerry Garcia
Robert Hunter



perrodetokio
Skeptic Friend

275 Posts

Posted - 08/09/2007 :  13:56:00   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send perrodetokio a Private Message
The most violent leaders? Looking back it seems a pretty close match. Maybe the impression given is because Clinton´s armed conflicts did not receive sufficient publicity so it contrasts with his good guy´s image. However, it´s hard to conclude if he was a more violent leader than Nixxon, Reagan, Bush senior, Bush junior or many other leaders from around the world, just as violent (or even more) but much less powerful.

How would you feel about a (de facto) President that makes 30,000 of his countrymen "disappear" (many others were officially executed) alluding to a "war on terror"?

We had a General, here in Argentina, who did exactly that. His claim was that the Communists were about to take control of the country, so he overthrew the democratically elected goverment in the 70´s and started a proper "war on terror". He was completely backed-up by the US Goverment.

By the early 80´s, the Argentinan people were absolutely fed-up with his goverment. So, as to regain the people´s sympathy, he started yet another war. This time, he tried to forcefully retake the Malvinas Islands (Falklands) from Britain. Problem was (besides Britain having a professional and better army and lots of training in actual wars) that his Rightwing goverment was so corrupt and had stolen so much from the education, health and even military budget, that our army got defeated quite quickly.

His trick back-fired and he got a big kick up his arse (instead, the British had to put up with many more years of Tatcher).

Now, don´t think I am biased towards rightwing goverments. I am quite aware of the brutality of most (if not all) communist goverments in history. Besides, now-a-days, some european centre-right goverments seem more progressive and less reactionary than other leftwing ones.

Cheers
perro de tokio

"Yes I have a belief in a creator/God but do not know that he exists." Bill Scott

"They are still mosquitoes! They did not turn into whales or lizards or anything else. They are still mosquitoes!..." Bill Scott

"We should have millions of missing links or transition fossils showing a fish turning into a philosopher..." Bill Scott
Go to Top of Page

GeeMack
SFN Regular

USA
1093 Posts

Posted - 08/09/2007 :  15:24:27   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send GeeMack a Private Message
It's hard to tell for sure your purpose in posting this, Gorgo, because after all, you haven't offered any opinion or commentary whatsoever. But I'll bite. It seems you're once again indicating that you have a problem with Bill Clinton. Although it might be nice to magically eliminate particular past actions of particular past presidents, obviously we can't. So what would you suggest as a reasonable course of action to resolve what you perceive to be the problems with Bill Clinton?
Go to Top of Page

Kil
Evil Skeptic

USA
13476 Posts

Posted - 08/09/2007 :  17:54:54   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Kil's Homepage  Send Kil an AOL message  Send Kil a Yahoo! Message Send Kil a Private Message
"I say we kill him!



I say we hang him, then we kill him!



I say we stomp him!



Then we tattoo him!



Then we hang him!



And then we kill him!"

Uncertainty may make you uncomfortable. Certainty makes you ridiculous.

Why not question something for a change?

Genetic Literacy Project
Go to Top of Page

Mycroft
Skeptic Friend

USA
427 Posts

Posted - 08/09/2007 :  22:56:54   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Mycroft a Private Message
Originally posted by Gorgo
http://www.antiwar.com/pilger/?articleid=11421


I don't think much of John Pilger. Chomsky likes him, and I think that's reason enough to dismiss him.
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 08/10/2007 :  02:00:32   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message
Originally posted by Mycroft

Originally posted by Gorgo
http://www.antiwar.com/pilger/?articleid=11421


I don't think much of John Pilger. Chomsky likes him, and I think that's reason enough to dismiss him.
That's a fallacious argument, Mycroft: Reducio ad Chomskium.


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

moakley
SFN Regular

USA
1888 Posts

Posted - 08/10/2007 :  05:02:31   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send moakley a Private Message
Originally posted by Kil

"I say we kill him!

I say we hang him and then we kill him.


Benjamin Gault: I've never been to a hanging. Mother might let you take me.
Carrie Gault: We'll be on the stage for home. Besides, you know how I feel about executions. There's some good in every man - killing him kills that, too.
From here.

Life is good

Philosophy is questions that may never be answered. Religion is answers that may never be questioned. -Anonymous
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 08/10/2007 :  05:24:44   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
Heh, I'm hearing from people who would vote for Hillary just to get Bill back in at least the vicinity of the White House. Me, I'd vote for Hillary for no better reason than to keep the Republican out, whoever he might be.




"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 08/10/2007 :  05:30:02   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message
You might not agree with the death penalty, but I'd say a lot of people here would think it would be a good idea to at least put away someone who murdered as many as Clinton. Why is there no outcry? Why are people paying to hear him speak? Why are people considering making him and his wife even richer by voting for her?

Because he didn't kill Americans.



I say we hang him, then we kill him!


I know the rent is in arrears
The dog has not been fed in years
It's even worse than it appears
But it's alright-
Jerry Garcia
Robert Hunter



Go to Top of Page

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 08/10/2007 :  05:31:24   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message
So far, she's done what she can to be a Republican.

Originally posted by filthy

Heh, I'm hearing from people who would vote for Hillary just to get Bill back in at least the vicinity of the White House. Me, I'd vote for Hillary for no better reason than to keep the Republican out, whoever he might be.





I know the rent is in arrears
The dog has not been fed in years
It's even worse than it appears
But it's alright-
Jerry Garcia
Robert Hunter



Go to Top of Page

Mycroft
Skeptic Friend

USA
427 Posts

Posted - 08/10/2007 :  06:35:24   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Mycroft a Private Message
Originally posted by HalfMooner


I don't think much of John Pilger. Chomsky likes him, and I think that's reason enough to dismiss him.
That's a fallacious argument, Mycroft: Reducio ad Chomskium.




Lol! :)
Go to Top of Page

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 08/10/2007 :  08:04:26   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message
And what is your point, that you think it's a good idea to support these criminals and that you do what you can to make them richer as well?


Originally posted by GeeMack

It's hard to tell for sure your purpose in posting this, Gorgo, because after all, you haven't offered any opinion or commentary whatsoever. But I'll bite. It seems you're once again indicating that you have a problem with Bill Clinton. Although it might be nice to magically eliminate particular past actions of particular past presidents, obviously we can't. So what would you suggest as a reasonable course of action to resolve what you perceive to be the problems with Bill Clinton?


I know the rent is in arrears
The dog has not been fed in years
It's even worse than it appears
But it's alright-
Jerry Garcia
Robert Hunter



Go to Top of Page

Gorgo
SFN Die Hard

USA
5310 Posts

Posted - 08/10/2007 :  09:19:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Gorgo a Private Message

Lol! :)


Aolus acronymium sillyassus

I know the rent is in arrears
The dog has not been fed in years
It's even worse than it appears
But it's alright-
Jerry Garcia
Robert Hunter



Go to Top of Page

GeeMack
SFN Regular

USA
1093 Posts

Posted - 08/10/2007 :  13:34:07   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send GeeMack a Private Message
Originally posted by Gorgo...

And what is your point, that you think it's a good idea to support these criminals and that you do what you can to make them richer as well?
My point is... well... allow me to phrase my posting in such a way that even a complete moron might understand it...
It's hard to tell for sure your purpose in posting this, Gorgo, because after all, you haven't offered any opinion or commentary whatsoever. But I'll bite. It seems you're once again indicating that you have a problem with Bill Clinton. Although it might be nice to magically eliminate particular past actions of particular past presidents, obviously we can't. So what would you suggest as a reasonable course of action to resolve what you perceive to be the problems with Bill Clinton?
For those with serious reading comprehension problems, nothing there says anything about supporting anyone for anything, nor does it express any position whatsoever about making anyone richer or poorer or anything of the sort. The question mark at the end indicates that I'm seeking your response regarding a practical, reasonable solution to your problem with Bill Clinton.
Edited by - GeeMack on 08/10/2007 13:37:20
Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 08/10/2007 :  16:02:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message
GeeMack, you have to know that Gorgo isn't going to answer that in any meaningful way. He's been asked that question, and several variants of it, atleast a dozen times in the last year or so.

Even when people agree with his basic premise Gorgo will criticize them for not following him off the logic-cliff.

This is a futile path, trying to get Gorgo to have a substantive discussion about some practical solutions to problems. He has nothing but complaints.


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

Original_Intent
SFN Regular

USA
609 Posts

Posted - 08/11/2007 :  07:35:00   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Original_Intent a Private Message
Originally posted by filthy

Heh, I'm hearing from people who would vote for Hillary just to get Bill back in at least the vicinity of the White House. Me, I'd vote for Hillary for no better reason than to keep the Republican out, whoever he might be.






Yep, be part of the problem.
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Next Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.12 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000