Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Community Forums
 General Discussion
 Caution: flammable water
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  

BigPapaSmurf
SFN Die Hard

3192 Posts

Posted - 11/15/2007 :  08:06:27  Show Profile Send BigPapaSmurf a Private Message  Reply with Quote
http://www.cnn.com/2007/TECH/science/11/14/saltwater.fire/index.html

Not exatly a cure for cancer, but pretty damn cool.

"...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History

"...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book, De Morte Peregrini

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 11/15/2007 :  11:42:45   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Well, I gotta think more energy's going into this than is coming out.

Oops, looks like Rustum Roy, the "scientist" who is so impressed, is a quack woo himself.

Wiki says:
Rustum Roy (born July 3, 1924) is a materials scientist, science policy analyst, advocate of interdisciplinary education and alternative medicine, and science and religion. Roy holds professorships in materials science at Arizona State University and in medicine at the University of Arizona, as well as emeritus honors at Pennsylvania State University (Penn State) in three fields.
Then there is this thread at JREF. In it, pgwenthold writes:
Rustom Roy is a pretty big loon. I remember back in the early 90s he was big on eliminating the peer review system, in the name of "young scientists" who apparently couldn't get their work published due to the biases of the old guys. Oddly enough, I didn't meet too many of them as I began my career. Roy postulated a system in which young people only needed to get a senior colleague endorsement of their work for it to be published. It never caught on (unless he did it in his own journal that he started).
In the article cited by the above JREF thread, Roy is defending the "memory" of water, in a homeopathy journal. This is in support of homeopathy's bizarre (but logically essential) claim that liquid water can somehow hold a fixed "structure" that will allow it to mimic the (supposed) effects of homeopathic "drugs" that have been diluted so much that not a single molecule of the drug is in the water.


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Edited by - HalfMooner on 11/15/2007 12:41:52
Go to Top of Page

BigPapaSmurf
SFN Die Hard

3192 Posts

Posted - 11/15/2007 :  11:51:55   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send BigPapaSmurf a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Yeah they mention the energy input in the article, they arent claiming free energy or anything.

"...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History

"...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book, De Morte Peregrini
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 11/15/2007 :  11:59:36   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
The trick I've discovered when some unknown makes an amazing breakthrough, is to ignore that guy for the moment, and start Googling any the "expert" is that is quoted as lending his/her authority to the "breakthrough." It worked before, and this time, too.


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Edited by - HalfMooner on 11/15/2007 12:03:37
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 11/15/2007 :  12:49:37   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Check out the kind of crap woo books that Rustum Roy promotes on his "Friends of Health" site. This guy walks and sounds like a professional quack, with his materials science providing a sideline and academic cover.

Pretty damned nasty of CNN to be pushing quackery.




Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Edited by - HalfMooner on 11/15/2007 13:05:52
Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 11/15/2007 :  14:13:28   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Even if the idea that the radio waves are breaking covalent bonds is true, is seems very unlikely that the resultant net energy is going to be a positive number.

The idea he has for treating cancer is not entirely implausible, but the technological hurdle of getting a metal particle large enough to be warmed by radio waves and small enough to pass a cell membrane into only cancerous cells is going to be difficult.


Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 11/15/2007 :  17:21:25   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I was caught quite off guard when the article started talking about free energy. The idea hadn't even occurred to me. I was still in shock and amazement how a brand new phenomena was found which only required relatively simple lab equipment. That is a discovery and that is science. Who cares if we're going to get energy out of this? It's great if we do, but the whole thing is still freakin' awesome even if we don't.

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 11/15/2007 :  17:38:53   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Considering Roy's involvement, I will accept that the water caught fire only after scientific duplication of the experiment -- even if it were admitted that more energy went into the water than came out.


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9696 Posts

Posted - 11/15/2007 :  20:18:39   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by HalfMooner

Considering Roy's involvement, I will accept that the water caught fire only after scientific duplication of the experiment -- even if it were admitted that more energy went into the water than came out.
The really interesting part is, how much extra energy?



As for the idea of burning cancer cells to death by radiation... that idea is old. Even the idea of having something in the cell that can burn up through energy transfer.
But radiation part isn't really that hard. The problem is navigating the "fuel" to the cancer cells without it spreading to other tissues. You would preferably want to be able to target metastases as well, by making the fuel deliverable by a system-wide dose.

To do that you need to research microbiology, and molecular biology. I doubt a retired radio station owner would have the qualification to even accidentally stumble onto the solution.

Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Go to Top of Page
  Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.08 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000