Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Pseudoscience
 Global Warming?
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26020 Posts

Posted - 03/26/2004 :  13:34:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
Robb wrote:
quote:
Has anybody heard of this movie coming out?

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,115203,00.html

I know the story is anti-global warming, but the movie still looks to be over the top and political in nature.
Nope, hadn't heard about it. From that "Junk Science" article:
quote:
So far, global warming appears to be just an excuse for Hollywood hedonism, human-bashing and electing John Kerry.

The movie's undeniable political overtones verge on the irresponsible, especially in an election year.
Including Milloy's own political overtones.

Perhaps if I were a regular reader of "Junk Science," I would be thoroughly disgusted with Milloy. As it is, I've read only a handful of his articles, but the last two - the one you linked to, Robb, and one I wrote about a while back - give me pains.

It's always seemed to me that if a person is going to make an argument that something is bad (even just through implication), they shouldn't go ahead and do that very thing. Especially not in the very same article. Milloy seems to be adept at it, however, and since he's a well-known and "award"-winning "debunker," I think he gives the "skeptical cause" somewhat of a black eye with his brand of argumentation.

Perhaps it's just me.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

dominic_dice
Skeptic Friend

United Kingdom
53 Posts

Posted - 04/20/2004 :  23:38:19   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send dominic_dice a Private Message
[/quote]
BINGO!
If the democrats can scare people into paying more taxes to 'clean up' or 'prevent' 'disasters' or force business into more restrictions (causing consumers to pay more) they will put their hand in it.
nlm
[/quote]

Is that implying that you don't think that Global Warming is an issue and that you vote Republican? Because I heard (admittidly off a very biased, enviromentilist websit) off a website that George bush owns an Oil Compnay. If that was true that would provide a good incentive not to care about global warming.
Go to Top of Page

Woody D
Skeptic Friend

Thailand
285 Posts

Posted - 04/21/2004 :  01:07:15   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Woody D a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by dominic_dice
Is that implying that you don't think that Global Warming is an issue and that you vote Republican? Because I heard (admittidly off a very biased, enviromentilist websit) off a website that George bush owns an Oil Compnay. If that was true that would provide a good incentive not to care about global warming.


If you are asking me personaly, I never used to vote for any one party, just because! Over the years I've switched back and forth in order to vote for the person I thought would do the best job for my views.
But the last several years I finally found a party that is compatable with most of what I think therefore I now do vote for a party line, in most cases. And that is Libertarian. Because I know when someone is in that party they have an agenda and it's stright forward, there is nothing to go back and forth on.
P. Bush IMO and from my observation has never said anything intelligent (that is, on his own, and his advisors or whomever writes his speeches aren't much better as for me agreeing with what they say) and I would never vote for him.
I'm not sure what you mean by global warming being an issue and voting republican though. I suppose it is an issue since people are talking about it but I don't know that it really exists or how much of a problem it is if it does or that voting republican has anything to do with it.
nlm

www.Carabao.net
As long as there's, you know, sex and drugs, I can do without the rock and roll.
Mick Shrimpton
Go to Top of Page

dominic_dice
Skeptic Friend

United Kingdom
53 Posts

Posted - 04/22/2004 :  01:16:41   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send dominic_dice a Private Message
Sorry I am not that knowledgable on American politics-would you consider that a left wing or right wing party?

"Are you THE dominic_dice"
"No, a dominic_dice. I come in six packs now"
Go to Top of Page

Woody D
Skeptic Friend

Thailand
285 Posts

Posted - 04/22/2004 :  17:11:19   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Woody D a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by dominic_dice

Sorry I am not that knowledgable on American politics-would you consider that a left wing or right wing party?


Dominic, a favor, please? If you could be so kind as to use quotes when you post so when we read them we know at a glance who you are asking or what other post you are anwering. Thank you.
IF you are asking about Libertarians, you can go on my personal webpage CuriousCreations.com and see the link for their site or do a search for them. Rather than me or anyone giving you a partial or biased response, look at what they are about from their own words.
nlm

www.Carabao.net
As long as there's, you know, sex and drugs, I can do without the rock and roll.
Mick Shrimpton
Go to Top of Page

tw101356
Skeptic Friend

USA
333 Posts

Posted - 04/22/2004 :  19:10:36   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send tw101356 a Private Message

This is Harvard Medical and Swiss Re warning about global warming. For those who don't know, Swiss Re is the world's largest reinsurance company. In a sense, they sell insurance to the insurance companies.

http://www.insurancejournal.com/news/international/2003/06/19/29988.htm

They say it's real and that it increases thier risk. Reinsurance companies don't like risk because it cuts profits.

"The reality here is simple: insurance and reinsurance companies have the potential to become prime catalysts for the development of renewables, emission reduction and energy-efficient technologies for two reasons: such steps will reduce risks and open up new and lucrative lines of business activity"

It's not just a PR issue. Global warming goes right to the bottom line.

- TW
Go to Top of Page

tomk80
SFN Regular

Netherlands
1278 Posts

Posted - 06/03/2004 :  08:18:27   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit tomk80's Homepage Send tomk80 a Private Message
Have yesterday seen "day after tomorrow" and it's actually quite cool (although obviously extremely exaggerated, but who cares). For anybody who is wondering about science and fact in the film, this might be a nice link.
The film has even been reviewed in the British Medical Journal . Haven't read the review yet and don't know whether you guys have access to it (I have because I'm doing an internship at a university). I'll post the link if I think about searching for it

edited to fix up link

Tom

`Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.'
-Through the Looking Glass by Lewis Caroll-
Edited by - tomk80 on 06/03/2004 08:20:04
Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9687 Posts

Posted - 06/05/2004 :  16:46:24   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by tomk80

Have yesterday seen "day after tomorrow" and it's actually quite cool (although obviously extremely exaggerated, but who cares).
I saw the movie this evening. And I would agree with the asessment that it's extreemely exaggerated. I have no idea how much of the "funky" stuff was accepted by non-skeptics. For me, it was "just another" sci-fi-catastrophe movie, with cool scenes and F/X just like Independence Day.

(edited spelling)

Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Edited by - Dr. Mabuse on 06/05/2004 16:47:15
Go to Top of Page

gm137
New Member

United Kingdom
14 Posts

Posted - 06/18/2004 :  00:42:33   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit gm137's Homepage Send gm137 a Private Message
The problem with an 'extremely exaggerated' movie like this is the number of people who won't think it's an exaggeration. As has been pointed out, several groups like to whip up hysteria in the global warming the debate - tabloid newspapers being a case in point. A calculation that is not often included in information given to the public is that some form of 'greenhouse effect' was necessary for life on earth as we know it to develop. Given average 'Insolation' values (solar radiation recieved by the earth) of approximately 3 kWh/m2/day, the average temperature of the earth 'should' be about -15 to -30 degrees C ( +5 to -22 degrees farenheit). The natural development of the earth's atmosphere and the associated greenhouse effect raised these vaues to the more temperate averages we generally enjoy.
I am not arguing that excessive global warming would not be a serious problem, indeed I believe strongly that we must decide on a course of action soon whilst remedial measures against a 'runaway' are still possible. However, we must make these decisions based on fact and reason, not emotive and uninformed opinion.
Still, in the meantime, 'Hollywood science' is fun to watch.

The name's Bond; Ionic bond.
Edited by - gm137 on 06/18/2004 00:44:43
Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 06/18/2004 :  19:54:19   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message
Hollywood science is awesome!

My favorite of all time is Star Wars and the nifty sounds all the ships make as they fly through vacuum.... and the explosions... Those gravity-bombs in attack of the clones? To cool for words

Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

tomk80
SFN Regular

Netherlands
1278 Posts

Posted - 06/19/2004 :  01:59:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit tomk80's Homepage Send tomk80 a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by gm137

The problem with an 'extremely exaggerated' movie like this is the number of people who won't think it's an exaggeration. As has been pointed out, several groups like to whip up hysteria in the global warming the debate - tabloid newspapers being a case in point. A calculation that is not often included in information given to the public is that some form of 'greenhouse effect' was necessary for life on earth as we know it to develop. Given average 'Insolation' values (solar radiation recieved by the earth) of approximately 3 kWh/m2/day, the average temperature of the earth 'should' be about -15 to -30 degrees C ( +5 to -22 degrees farenheit). The natural development of the earth's atmosphere and the associated greenhouse effect raised these vaues to the more temperate averages we generally enjoy.
I am not arguing that excessive global warming would not be a serious problem, indeed I believe strongly that we must decide on a course of action soon whilst remedial measures against a 'runaway' are still possible. However, we must make these decisions based on fact and reason, not emotive and uninformed opinion.
Still, in the meantime, 'Hollywood science' is fun to watch.



I very much agree with you. As an environmental health intern (if everything goes allright I'll be calling myself scientists in about three months!!!) I am for example very aware of the damage done by the first reports of environmental problems in general, and especially the doomsday scenario's often presented by environmental organisations such as Greenpeace. Fortunately, those organisations have become a lot more professional since that time.
The film is on the one hand a great way to bring the global warming effect in publicity. However, people might decide that the film is exagerated and hence global warming as presented by the people warning for it is also exagerrated. But probably I'm just thinking to negatively on this. Overall, I'd say it's great that global warming is once more brought under public attention.

Tom

`Contrariwise,' continued Tweedledee, `if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic.'
-Through the Looking Glass by Lewis Caroll-
Go to Top of Page

gm137
New Member

United Kingdom
14 Posts

Posted - 06/19/2004 :  06:34:47   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit gm137's Homepage Send gm137 a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by tomk80
I very much agree with you. As an environmental health intern (if everything goes allright I'll be calling myself scientists in about three months!!!).



Good luck!

The name's Bond; Ionic bond.
Edited by - gm137 on 06/19/2004 06:35:08
Go to Top of Page

dominic_dice
Skeptic Friend

United Kingdom
53 Posts

Posted - 07/04/2004 :  13:19:34   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send dominic_dice a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Woody D

quote:
Originally posted by dominic_dice

Sorry I am not that knowledgable on American politics-would you consider that a left wing or right wing party?


Dominic, a favor, please? If you could be so kind as to use quotes when you post so when we read them we know at a glance who you are asking or what other post you are anwering. Thank you.
IF you are asking about Libertarians, you can go on my personal webpage CuriousCreations.com and see the link for their site or do a search for them. Rather than me or anyone giving you a partial or biased response, look at what they are about from their own words.
nlm


Sorry!. Yeah I was talking about the Libertarians, thanks for the link.

"Are you THE dominic_dice"
"No, a dominic_dice. I come in six packs now"
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.12 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000