Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 General Skepticism
 Randi and Global Warming
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 8

Machi4velli
SFN Regular

USA
854 Posts

Posted - 10/13/2010 :  00:39:05   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Machi4velli a Private Message  Reply with Quote
There were some pretty bad arguments made in An Inconvenient Truth. Not because good arguments don't exist, however. I saw some "see, here's an inflection point in our graph, x coincided with it, therefore, x caused it." It was pop science, the real science wasn't shown. Good science exists to support the conclusions, but it didn't make it into the movie in parts. I don't think there's enough in the movie to really indicate how much real support the conclusions have if you didn't read further.

The "probability-driven" complaint is nonsense though. I'm not sure what he means by "multifactorial" functions, but I presume he doesn't mean what it means in math, and just means functions with many factors, but that isn't a valid complaint either. (Unless he has a more detailed argument.)

"Truth does not change because it is, or is not, believed by a majority of the people."
-Giordano Bruno

"The greatest enemy of knowledge is not ignorance, but the illusion of knowledge."
-Stephen Hawking

"Seeking what is true is not seeking what is desirable"
-Albert Camus
Go to Top of Page

Dr. Mabuse
Septic Fiend

Sweden
9687 Posts

Posted - 10/13/2010 :  08:02:57   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Dr. Mabuse an ICQ Message Send Dr. Mabuse a Private Message  Reply with Quote
At my work, we analyse our production output quality factors using statistics. And even in that situation, where hard math is applied to actual production numbers, the final result is presented with a probability span and a certainty factor less than 100%.

(I haven't bothered to learn exactly how that work, because those statistics is only mariginally important to my work, but since the application stretches so much farther, I just might.)



Edited to correct spelling.

Dr. Mabuse - "When the going gets tough, the tough get Duct-tape..."
Dr. Mabuse whisper.mp3

"Equivocation is not just a job, for a creationist it's a way of life..." Dr. Mabuse

Support American Troops in Iraq:
Send them unarmed civilians for target practice..
Collateralmurder.
Edited by - Dr. Mabuse on 10/16/2010 11:23:45
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 8 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.11 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000