Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Creation/Evolution
 What field of science agrees with Creationists?
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page | Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 7

BigPapaSmurf
SFN Die Hard

3192 Posts

Posted - 09/22/2004 :  12:18:36   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send BigPapaSmurf a Private Message
It doesnt agree with math because of the whole, God can manipulate physics thing.

Is Abnormal Psychology a science?

Note: The preceding was a joke however poorly constructed.

"...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History

"...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book, De Morte Peregrini
Go to Top of Page

Dude
SFN Die Hard

USA
6891 Posts

Posted - 09/22/2004 :  14:29:53   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Dude a Private Message
Creationism in general is going to conflict with any science. Why? Because science seeks answers and explanations that do not involve the supernatural. The creationist dogma requires a supernatural explanation for the central tenets of their beliefs.

Ignorance is preferable to error; and he is less remote from the truth who believes nothing, than he who believes what is wrong.
-- Thomas Jefferson

"god :: the last refuge of a man with no answers and no argument." - G. Carlin

Hope, n.
The handmaiden of desperation; the opiate of despair; the illegible signpost on the road to perdition. ~~ da filth
Go to Top of Page

verlch
SFN Regular

781 Posts

Posted - 09/22/2004 :  22:35:30   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send verlch an AOL message Send verlch a Private Message
quote:

Deny evolution, and you're denying the basis for the entire field.


Then I will deny it just as you deny my maker. You could give me death before I will believe in that rubbish.

What came first the chicken or the egg?

How do plants exist without bugs in the soil, and bugs in the soil without plants producing oxygen?

There are no atheists in foxholes

Underlying the evolutionary theory is not just the classic "stuff" of science — conclusions arrived at through prolonged observation and experimentation. Evolution is first an atheistic, materialistic world view. In other words, the primary reason for its acceptance has little to do with the evidence for or against it. Evolution is accepted because men are atheists by faith and thus interpret the evidence to cor-respond to their naturalistic philosophy.

For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. II Timothy 4:3,4

II Thess. 2:11 And for this cause God shall
send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

You can not see the 'wind', but you can see its effect!!!!

Evolution was caused by genetic mistakes at each stage?

Radical Evolution has 500 million years to find fossils of fictional drawings of (hard core)missing links, yet they find none.

We have not seen such moral darkness since the dark ages, coencides with
teaching evolution in schools. (Moral darkness)

For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places, EPH 6:12.

"Thus, many scientists embracing naturalism find themselves in the seeming dilemma recently articulated by biochemist Franklin Harold: "We should reject, as a matter of principle, the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity [i.e., Darwinian evolution]; but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations."
Go to Top of Page

verlch
SFN Regular

781 Posts

Posted - 09/22/2004 :  22:39:40   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send verlch an AOL message Send verlch a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by furshur

quote:
Math... it violates Math too, doesn't it?

Yes it does.

Creationists believe that several million species of animals were contained in an impossibly small volume (Noah's big boat)

Creationsists believe that 10 billion years = 7 days.






I suppose the same question can be applied to you, my radical friend. If you weren't there 10 billion years ago, how do you know what happened?

What came first the chicken or the egg?

How do plants exist without bugs in the soil, and bugs in the soil without plants producing oxygen?

There are no atheists in foxholes

Underlying the evolutionary theory is not just the classic "stuff" of science — conclusions arrived at through prolonged observation and experimentation. Evolution is first an atheistic, materialistic world view. In other words, the primary reason for its acceptance has little to do with the evidence for or against it. Evolution is accepted because men are atheists by faith and thus interpret the evidence to cor-respond to their naturalistic philosophy.

For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. II Timothy 4:3,4

II Thess. 2:11 And for this cause God shall
send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

You can not see the 'wind', but you can see its effect!!!!

Evolution was caused by genetic mistakes at each stage?

Radical Evolution has 500 million years to find fossils of fictional drawings of (hard core)missing links, yet they find none.

We have not seen such moral darkness since the dark ages, coencides with
teaching evolution in schools. (Moral darkness)

For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places, EPH 6:12.

"Thus, many scientists embracing naturalism find themselves in the seeming dilemma recently articulated by biochemist Franklin Harold: "We should reject, as a matter of principle, the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity [i.e., Darwinian evolution]; but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations."
Go to Top of Page

furshur
SFN Regular

USA
1536 Posts

Posted - 09/23/2004 :  05:40:52   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send furshur a Private Message
verlich wrote:
quote:
I suppose the same question can be applied to you, my radical friend. If you weren't there 10 billion years ago, how do you know what happened?

Radical? I say show me proof before I accept something as fact. You on the other hand have stated that you would rather kill yourself than change your beliefs regardless of the proof. If there was proof of your position I would gladly change my beliefs.

Who's the radical again???


If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know.
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 09/23/2004 :  06:46:11   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by verlch

quote:
Originally posted by furshur

quote:
Math... it violates Math too, doesn't it?

Yes it does.

Creationists believe that several million species of animals were contained in an impossibly small volume (Noah's big boat)

Creationsists believe that 10 billion years = 7 days.






I suppose the same question can be applied to you, my radical friend. If you weren't there 10 billion years ago, how do you know what happened?

Erm, I see. And you were there 6,000 years ago and saw it all. Thus you've no need to look critically at the superstitious screeving of peoples of Bibical times. Well done, I say. Well done!

Perhaps you can clear up a point of confusion for me: Why did some god or other even bother? Does it have an ego so fragil that it has to have praise 24/7? And what did it do before deciding to set up our happy, little hive?


"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

Siberia
SFN Addict

Brazil
2322 Posts

Posted - 09/23/2004 :  08:17:38   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Siberia's Homepage  Send Siberia an AOL message  Send Siberia a Yahoo! Message Send Siberia a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by filthy

quote:
Originally posted by verlch

quote:
Originally posted by furshur

quote:
Math... it violates Math too, doesn't it?

Yes it does.

Creationists believe that several million species of animals were contained in an impossibly small volume (Noah's big boat)

Creationsists believe that 10 billion years = 7 days.






I suppose the same question can be applied to you, my radical friend. If you weren't there 10 billion years ago, how do you know what happened?

Erm, I see. And you were there 6,000 years ago and saw it all. Thus you've no need to look critically at the superstitious screeving of peoples of Bibical times. Well done, I say. Well done!

Perhaps you can clear up a point of confusion for me: Why did some god or other even bother? Does it have an ego so fragil that it has to have praise 24/7? And what did it do before deciding to set up our happy, little hive?





Stole the words outta my mouth. And why your God, anyway? And not the others?

"Why are you afraid of something you're not even sure exists?"
- The Kovenant, Via Negativa

"People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefs."
-- unknown
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 09/23/2004 :  08:39:21   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by verlch

quote:

Deny evolution, and you're denying the basis for the entire field.


Then I will deny it just as you deny my maker. You could give me death before I will believe in that rubbish.



Evolution does not deny the existance of God. It makes no comment on it what so ever.

The "poor persecuted Christian" bit is getting old, uberfundie. We have no interest in forcing you to believe as we do. We just want you to defend your assertations with valid sources. We fully expect to defend our assertations with sources (and oftentimes, they are cited before being asked for them).


Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page

verlch
SFN Regular

781 Posts

Posted - 09/24/2004 :  12:00:56   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send verlch an AOL message Send verlch a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by furshur

verlich wrote:
quote:
I suppose the same question can be applied to you, my radical friend. If you weren't there 10 billion years ago, how do you know what happened?

Radical? I say show me proof before I accept something as fact. You on the other hand have stated that you would rather kill yourself than change your beliefs regardless of the proof. If there was proof of your position I would gladly change my beliefs.

Who's the radical again???





At 12, 13 I made up my mind. Believed in God. Couldn't see any other way. Evoulution offered theories and no concrete proof, and I wondered the reasoning why so many choose to believe in it. How could a woman that looked so good, come from nothing and cook the next human in the oven. A car never evolved to sit there as a car, it took time to develpe it and to put it together!

Originally Darwin needed only 1 million years to make evolution happen, now its turned into billions. I say your going to need trillions when I am done with the theory!!

What came first the chicken or the egg?

How do plants exist without bugs in the soil, and bugs in the soil without plants producing oxygen?

There are no atheists in foxholes

Underlying the evolutionary theory is not just the classic "stuff" of science — conclusions arrived at through prolonged observation and experimentation. Evolution is first an atheistic, materialistic world view. In other words, the primary reason for its acceptance has little to do with the evidence for or against it. Evolution is accepted because men are atheists by faith and thus interpret the evidence to cor-respond to their naturalistic philosophy.

For the time will come when they will not endure sound doctrine; but after their own lusts shall they heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears; And they shall turn away their ears from the truth, and shall be turned unto fables. II Timothy 4:3,4

II Thess. 2:11 And for this cause God shall
send them strong delusion, that they should believe a lie:

You can not see the 'wind', but you can see its effect!!!!

Evolution was caused by genetic mistakes at each stage?

Radical Evolution has 500 million years to find fossils of fictional drawings of (hard core)missing links, yet they find none.

We have not seen such moral darkness since the dark ages, coencides with
teaching evolution in schools. (Moral darkness)

For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places, EPH 6:12.

"Thus, many scientists embracing naturalism find themselves in the seeming dilemma recently articulated by biochemist Franklin Harold: "We should reject, as a matter of principle, the substitution of intelligent design for the dialogue of chance and necessity [i.e., Darwinian evolution]; but we must concede that there are presently no detailed Darwinian accounts of the evolution of any biochemical system, only a variety of wishful speculations."
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 09/24/2004 :  12:14:03   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by verlch

quote:
Originally posted by furshur

verlich wrote:
quote:
I suppose the same question can be applied to you, my radical friend. If you weren't there 10 billion years ago, how do you know what happened?

Radical? I say show me proof before I accept something as fact. You on the other hand have stated that you would rather kill yourself than change your beliefs regardless of the proof. If there was proof of your position I would gladly change my beliefs.

Who's the radical again???





At 12, 13 I made up my mind. Believed in God. Couldn't see any other way. Evoulution offered theories and no concrete proof, and I wondered the reasoning why so many choose to believe in it. How could a woman that looked so good, come from nothing and cook the next human in the oven. A car never evolved to sit there as a car, it took time to develpe it and to put it together!

Originally Darwin needed only 1 million years to make evolution happen, now its turned into billions. I say your going to need trillions when I am done with the theory!!


"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 09/24/2004 :  12:17:39   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by filthy

quote:
Originally posted by verlch

quote:
Originally posted by furshur

verlich wrote:
[quote]I suppose the same question can be applied to you, my radical friend. If you weren't there 10 billion years ago, how do you know what happened?

Radical? I say show me proof before I accept something as fact. You on the other hand have stated that you would rather kill yourself than change your beliefs regardless of the proof. If there was proof of your position I would gladly change my beliefs.

Who's the radical again???





At 12, 13 I made up my mind. Believed in God. Couldn't see any other way. Evoulution offered theories and no concrete proof, and I wondered the reasoning why so many choose to believe in it. How could a woman that looked so good, come from nothing and cook the next human in the oven. A car never evolved to sit there as a car, it took time to develpe it and to put it together!

Originally Darwin needed only 1 million years to make evolution happen, now its turned into billions. I say your going to need trillions when I am done with the theory!!

Verlch, of all the preposterous statements you've made, with all of the confirmed evidence we have given you, this one is not the most preposterous.

But, it's close.


"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

furshur
SFN Regular

USA
1536 Posts

Posted - 09/24/2004 :  12:26:46   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send furshur a Private Message
quote:
Verlich said:
How could a woman that looked so good, come from nothing and cook the next human in the oven.

Well I certainly can't argue with that statement. Because I haven't got a freaking clue what in the hell that is even suppose to mean!! Are you trying to make some sort of point or are you just randomly stringing words together?


If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know.
Go to Top of Page

BigPapaSmurf
SFN Die Hard

3192 Posts

Posted - 09/24/2004 :  12:34:21   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send BigPapaSmurf a Private Message
So your vast sophisticated research of evolution at the age of 12 produced no evidence? What sources did you use to come to that decision?

Woman didnt come from nothing as you assert, it came from another woman whos genetic makeup and DNA were slightly different, repeat this process a million times and viola she wont even look human.

You dont seem to understand Darwin in the slightest. Darwin said million because he only had the tip of the iceburg of data. That and the age of the world was not known at the time. Claiming that evolution is invalid because Darwin made mistakes is like saying cars wont work because they dont have steam engines anymore. Things change in science when new data arises, like the internal combustion engine for example.

If Darwin had all the data we have he would not have made those mistakes. But lucikly in science we must change when new data thwarts the old. We no longer use 'Darwinian evolution' because he didnt have enough time and manpower, but evolution is still the driving force for modern Biology, Genetics, Paleontology, Epidemiology, Oncology, Parasitology, Ecology, Zoology, Etc., Etc., Etc.

The car has evolved quite a bit in a hundred years eh?

Note: 'Woman who looked so good' this is a matter of opinion, if all humans had buck teeth and a third eye, that would look good to you too because youd be just like them.

"...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History

"...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book, De Morte Peregrini
Go to Top of Page

Siberia
SFN Addict

Brazil
2322 Posts

Posted - 09/24/2004 :  15:41:02   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Siberia's Homepage  Send Siberia an AOL message  Send Siberia a Yahoo! Message Send Siberia a Private Message
quote:
How could a woman that looked so good, come from nothing and cook the next human in the oven.

Here's our good ol' mysogyne friend (I probably butchered that word).
What DOES matter is: how so many Come-From-God men could torture and burn the oh-so-frail-looking-so-good women?

Yes, I know I shouldn't provoke. I just can't resist it.

"Why are you afraid of something you're not even sure exists?"
- The Kovenant, Via Negativa

"People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefs."
-- unknown
Go to Top of Page

Ricky
SFN Die Hard

USA
4907 Posts

Posted - 09/24/2004 :  17:35:36   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Send Ricky an AOL message Send Ricky a Private Message
quote:
At 12, 13 I made up my mind. Believed in God. Couldn't see any other way. Evoulution offered theories and no concrete proof, and I wondered the reasoning why so many choose to believe in it. How could a woman that looked so good, come from nothing and cook the next human in the oven. A car never evolved to sit there as a car, it took time to develpe it and to put it together!


Same old misconceptions of science. Verlch, I have a question, would you like to actually learn what it is you are disagreeing with?

Why continue? Because we must. Because we have the call. Because it is nobler to fight for rationality without winning than to give up in the face of continued defeats. Because whatever true progress humanity makes is through the rationality of the occasional individual and because any one individual we may win for the cause may do more for humanity than a hundred thousand who hug their superstitions to their breast.
- Isaac Asimov
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 7 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page | Next Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.66 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000