Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Our Skeptic Forums
 Conspiracy Theories
 We never went to Mars, Saturn, and the Moon - 3
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Next Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 15

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 08/22/2005 :  08:32:25  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
The second thread has gone 15 pages, so...... before it gets locked, lets remind bigbrain of the questions he has failed to answer while demanding answers from us.

Answer the following questions that have been put to you

For your convenience, I have classified them and referenced who asked the question. In the case of multiple people asking the same question, I have tried to list all of the people who asked.

The categories are GEN - for general questions relation to personal experiences, DI - for questions about Deep Impact/Temple 1, EX - for questions about explosives/flammable materials, and LM - for questions relating to space travel

1)(LM) Where is the money scammed off of the moon shot program? -- filthy/Fripp/H Humbert
2) (LM) Who's got it? -- filthy/Fripp
3) (LM) Did NASA plan all the well-publicized failures as well? -- Fripp
4) (LM) So maybe you could explain to me how we should know (again, we are ignoring all the stuff that has been posted) how NASA controls their probes? -- Ricky
5) (DI) Now if this was a NASA hoax how did they get the comet to brighten at just the right moment? -- Stargirl/Kil
6) (DI) Or are professional and amateur astronomers from around the world in cahoots with NASA too? -- Stargirl
7) (DI) Or maybe you think NASA asked a psychic when the comet would brighten due to a natural outburst and used that time for their time of impact? -- Stargirl
8) (DI) What were exposure settings for the first photo? -- pleco
9) (EX) Then why is water used to extinguish fires? -- Fripp
10) (LM) Can you show your plan for getting the satellite up to that speed and the trajectory, including the math showing the gravitation pull of the planets and sun, plus the amount of money required? -- pleco
11) (LM) what evidence do you have that Softimage, Maya, 3D Studio Max, LightWave 3D invent these images for NASA? -- Me
12) (GEN) Have you ever piloted a plane? -- pleco
13) (LM) How fast was Cassini actually going when the launch vehicle quit pushing it? -- Dave W
14) (LM) How high (from the Earth) was Cassini when the launch vehicle quit pushing it? -- Dave W

These are all the questions I can find placed to you in the last 29 pages of this subject. You have yet to respond to any of them.

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion

Edited by - Valiant Dancer on 08/22/2005 08:33:07

Siberia
SFN Addict

Brazil
2322 Posts

Posted - 08/22/2005 :  10:37:17   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Siberia's Homepage  Send Siberia an AOL message  Send Siberia a Yahoo! Message Send Siberia a Private Message
As for the picture I posted earlier:

Yes, it's only an imaginary planet. Said artist is well aware of the physical problems with it and claims she took some artistic liberties with said picture It was only a boredom-born project anyway.

However, if you really want some professional space art: this guy is your man.

P.S.: I'm not sure that's the correct url. I'll check when I get home.

"Why are you afraid of something you're not even sure exists?"
- The Kovenant, Via Negativa

"People who don't like their beliefs being laughed at shouldn't have such funny beliefs."
-- unknown
Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26020 Posts

Posted - 08/22/2005 :  18:07:58   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
Val wrote (in the previous thread):
quote:
The art, though beautiful, has some interesting astronomical problems if it really existed.

First, the dual rings are too close to the equator and too large.
Second, the moons are too close together in orbit of the planet to be stable.

But that's just what I'm thinking is wrong.
The first problem that caught my eye was the dual, parallel rings. Of course, dual rings of any sort would quickly merge somewhere close to the planet's axis of rotation due to tidal forces and collisions, but parallel rings would mean that one (or both) is (or are) not orbiting the planet's center-of-gravity.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

BigPapaSmurf
SFN Die Hard

3192 Posts

Posted - 08/23/2005 :  05:06:32   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send BigPapaSmurf a Private Message
On this note, they found one of the inner sattelites to be creating a ring of water vapor as it swings around Saturn, It spews the water at high pressure and it escapes the weak gravity. This answers the question they had as to how that particular delicate ring maintins its structure.

"...things I have neither seen nor experienced nor heard tell of from anybody else; things, what is more, that do not in fact exist and could not ever exist at all. So my readers must not believe a word I say." -Lucian on his book True History

"...They accept such things on faith alone, without any evidence. So if a fraudulent and cunning person who knows how to take advantage of a situation comes among them, he can make himself rich in a short time." -Lucian critical of early Christians c.166 AD From his book, De Morte Peregrini
Go to Top of Page

Valiant Dancer
Forum Goalie

USA
4826 Posts

Posted - 08/23/2005 :  06:21:45   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Valiant Dancer's Homepage Send Valiant Dancer a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by Dave W.

Val wrote (in the previous thread):
quote:
The art, though beautiful, has some interesting astronomical problems if it really existed.

First, the dual rings are too close to the equator and too large.
Second, the moons are too close together in orbit of the planet to be stable.

But that's just what I'm thinking is wrong.
The first problem that caught my eye was the dual, parallel rings. Of course, dual rings of any sort would quickly merge somewhere close to the planet's axis of rotation due to tidal forces and collisions, but parallel rings would mean that one (or both) is (or are) not orbiting the planet's center-of-gravity.



As is the case with halo rings. Which is why I was going for too large and too close to the equator. If we wanted to keep the rings the size they are, then yes, they'd merge near the equator.

Cthulhu/Asmodeus when you're tired of voting for the lesser of two evils

Brother Cutlass of Reasoned Discussion
Go to Top of Page

bigbrain
BANNED

409 Posts

Posted - 08/26/2005 :  12:17:50   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bigbrain a Private Message
Dear friend Valiant Dancer, I haven't much time, I'm using the computer of hotel owner.

Do you remember this question?

---------------------------------------------------------------

Originally posted by Valiant Dancer

"... As has been pointed out several times before but you ardently refuse to listen, the craft you show is not the only one used for training ..."

Originally posted by bigbrain

>>> ”Then show the others, please”

OK.

in flight testing of the LM.

http://dayton.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001110.jpg

time lapse photo of lander trainer

http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001281.jpg

here's a later LM trainer.

http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001744.jpg

A better picture of the same

http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001889.jpg

(edited to add more pictures)

LM training in Earth orbit.

http://grin.hq.nasa.gov/IMAGES/SMALL/GPN-2000-001106.jpg

----------------------------------------------------------------


YOU HAVEN'T ANSWERED

The first and the last image show LM used to go to the Moon.

The other ones show the same strange collage of a helicopter cockpit with a lattice.

I'D LIKE TO SEE THAT RIDICULOUS OLD CROCK IN FLIGHT

LET ME SEE IT IN FLIGHT AND I WILL ANSWER ALL OTHER QUESTIONS.

It's too wonderful here Do you like windsurf?

"Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit" (Flattery gets friends, truth hatred)
Publius Terentius Afer, "Terence", Roman dramatist

Go to Top of Page

Cuneiformist
The Imperfectionist

USA
4955 Posts

Posted - 08/26/2005 :  13:18:16   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Cuneiformist a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by bigbrain
I'D LIKE TO SEE THAT RIDICULOUS OLD CROCK IN FLIGHT

LET ME SEE IT IN FLIGHT AND I WILL ANSWER ALL OTHER QUESTIONS.
Brilliant, birbrain! Since neither Val nor anyone else at SFN can actually make NASA dust off their old test vehicles and launch them, we'll almost certainly never be able to show you "that ridiculous old crock in flight." (Does anyone have old NASA footage?) So we can't meet your ridiculous challenge and you don't have to "answer all other questions."

Perhaps, then, you'll drop this thread (you've failed horribly, anyhow) and move on to something you can prove...
Go to Top of Page

furshur
SFN Regular

USA
1536 Posts

Posted - 08/26/2005 :  14:02:46   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send furshur a Private Message
quote:
(Does anyone have old NASA footage?)

YES!

Here is the link to a quicktime clip showing Neil Armstrong flying the LLRV (Lunar Landing Research Vehicle).

Enjoy!

http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Movie/LLRV/HTML/EM-0019-05.html

If I knew then what I know now then I would know more now than I know.
Go to Top of Page

bigbrain
BANNED

409 Posts

Posted - 08/27/2005 :  06:43:11   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bigbrain a Private Message
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by furshur

"... Here is the link to a quicktime clip showing Neil Armstrong flying the LLRV (Lunar Landing Research Vehicle).

Enjoy!

http://www.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Movie/LLRV/HTML/EM-0019-05.html"

------------------------------------------------------------------

And here is the link to a quicktime clip showing a fake flight of SLLRV (Steam Lunar Landing Research Vehicle)

Enjoy!!!

http://trc.dfrc.nasa.gov/Gallery/Movie/LLRV/Small/EM-0019-03.mov


"Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit" (Flattery gets friends, truth hatred)
Publius Terentius Afer, "Terence", Roman dramatist

Go to Top of Page

Dave W.
Info Junkie

USA
26020 Posts

Posted - 08/27/2005 :  07:43:38   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Dave W.'s Homepage Send Dave W. a Private Message
quote:
Originally posted by bigbrain

And here is the link to a quicktime clip showing a fake flight of SLLRV (Steam Lunar Landing Research Vehicle)
We tend to work in evidence, here. Where is your evidence that that clip shows a "fake flight?"

Of course, your question was answered, regardless of what you think of that answer. The fact that you haven't lived up to your end of your proposed bargain clearly demonstrates your low moral character.

- Dave W. (Private Msg, EMail)
Evidently, I rock!
Why not question something for a change?
Visit Dave's Psoriasis Info, too.
Go to Top of Page

filthy
SFN Die Hard

USA
14408 Posts

Posted - 08/27/2005 :  08:08:35   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send filthy a Private Message
Sure wish I knew where all that money went. Why, if I worked it right, I might could blackmail a little of it my way....

So, let's try smoking this bear out from another direction. It would be easy to find if all of these endevors were faked simply by looking at inventory records. Every nut, bolt, pop-rivit and strip of duct tape used by NASA has a NASA part number. Each and every vehicle and simulator has a list of the necessary parts needed to build it. In-fucking-triplicate, and not only does NASA have it, but the contractors involved as well. All one has to do is go over the lists and see that all parts required were used. As most of it is ancient history, the Freedom of Information Act might help get the documents.

Simple, no? Has anyone thought to do this? Of coures not. Chances are, they'd have to find and sell a new conspiricy, or knowingly tell outright lies.


"What luck for rulers that men do not think." -- Adolf Hitler (1889 - 1945)

"If only we could impeach on the basis of criminal stupidity, 90% of the Rethuglicans and half of the Democrats would be thrown out of office." ~~ P.Z. Myres


"The default position of human nature is to punch the other guy in the face and take his stuff." ~~ Dude

Brother Boot Knife of Warm Humanitarianism,

and Crypto-Communist!

Go to Top of Page

bigbrain
BANNED

409 Posts

Posted - 08/27/2005 :  09:30:26   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bigbrain a Private Message
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by Dave W.

... Of course, your question was answered, regardless of what you think of that answer. The fact that you haven't lived up to your end of your proposed bargain clearly demonstrates your low moral character.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

It's raining here

Dear Dave W.

my question "Then show the others, please" was NOT answered

I'D LIKE TO SEE AT LEAST ANOTHER OLD CROCK IN FLIGHT, NOT THAT RIDICULOUS DINOSAUR SKELETON WITH THAT WONDERFUL "PININFARINA-FERRARI" COCKPIT







"Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit" (Flattery gets friends, truth hatred)
Publius Terentius Afer, "Terence", Roman dramatist

Go to Top of Page

bigbrain
BANNED

409 Posts

Posted - 08/27/2005 :  09:50:38   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bigbrain a Private Message
I have already answered all questions of Valiant Dancer

For example:

11) (LM) what evidence do you have that Softimage, Maya, 3D Studio Max, LightWave 3D invent these images for NASA? -- Me


"Do you believe this picture is real?
http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/gallery/all/2/f/044/2F130264571EFF0700P1120L0M1.HTML

Why do NASA's buffoons use fisheye lens?

To make all these poor pictures more mysterious, more interesting.

But all these pictures are very ugly, very poor: is Mars only a sphere full of stones?

WHY IS THIS PICTURE FAKE?

Look at the "sky". It seems a grey level surface illuminated by a spot light. Where are all the variegated gradations, shadows, tones, nuances of the atmosphere?

Is Mars so insignificant, so inexpressive?

IT'S NOT POSSIBLE, DEAR GULLIBLE PEOPLE"

"Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit" (Flattery gets friends, truth hatred)
Publius Terentius Afer, "Terence", Roman dramatist

Go to Top of Page

bigbrain
BANNED

409 Posts

Posted - 08/27/2005 :  09:58:16   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bigbrain a Private Message
10) (LM) Can you show your plan for getting the satellite up to that speed and the trajectory, including the math showing the gravitation pull of the planets and sun, plus the amount of money required? -- pleco

There is no technology today with which we could go to the moon, to Mars or Saturn

"Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit" (Flattery gets friends, truth hatred)
Publius Terentius Afer, "Terence", Roman dramatist

Go to Top of Page

bigbrain
BANNED

409 Posts

Posted - 08/27/2005 :  10:01:25   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bigbrain a Private Message
1)(LM) Where is the money scammed off of the moon shot program? -- filthy/Fripp/H Humbert
2) (LM) Who's got it? -- filthy/Fripp

The money have flown away

"Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit" (Flattery gets friends, truth hatred)
Publius Terentius Afer, "Terence", Roman dramatist

Go to Top of Page

bigbrain
BANNED

409 Posts

Posted - 08/27/2005 :  10:06:06   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send bigbrain a Private Message
5) (DI) Now if this was a NASA hoax how did they get the comet to brighten at just the right moment? -- Stargirl/Kil
6) (DI) Or are professional and amateur astronomers from around the world in cahoots with NASA too? -- Stargirl
7) (DI) Or maybe you think NASA asked a psychic when the comet would brighten due to a natural outburst and used that time for their time of impact? -- Stargirl

Only metropolitan legends

"Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit" (Flattery gets friends, truth hatred)
Publius Terentius Afer, "Terence", Roman dramatist

Go to Top of Page
Page: of 15 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Next Page
 New Topic  Topic Locked
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.24 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000