Skeptic Friends Network

Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?
Home | Forums | Active Topics | Active Polls | Register | FAQ | Contact Us  
  Connect: Chat | SFN Messenger | Buddy List | Members
Personalize: Profile | My Page | Forum Bookmarks  
 All Forums
 Interactive SFN Forums
 Polls, Votes and Surveys
 How are we doing?
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Previous Page
Author Previous Topic Topic Next Topic
Page: of 2

Abdul Alhazred
Skeptic Friend

USA
58 Posts

Posted - 08/11/2007 :  21:17:41   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit Abdul Alhazred's Homepage Send Abdul Alhazred a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I voted 'other'.

I haven't been slapped down yet, so how can I tell what's wrong with the way you guys moderate?


The lack of a rational explanation is not evidence for an irrational explanation.
Go to Top of Page

HalfMooner
Dingaling

Philippines
15831 Posts

Posted - 08/12/2007 :  00:58:18   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send HalfMooner a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I've been slapped silly here. But, seriously, I voted "Just about right." I think you guys do a great job of keeping a reasonable amount of order, while trying to maintain a feeling of freedom in these fora.


Biology is just physics that has begun to smell bad.” —HalfMooner
Here's a link to Moonscape News, and one to its Archive.
Go to Top of Page

@tomic
Administrator

USA
4607 Posts

Posted - 08/27/2007 :  18:41:34   [Permalink]  Show Profile  Visit @tomic's Homepage Send @tomic a Private Message  Reply with Quote
Originally posted by Kil

Well, almost no one is taking this poll. Hmmmm... It's not as though we can see how you voted you know.

In all fairness Kil, the powers of SQL allow for this if members vote while logged in. I just can't imagine any reason for doing so.

@

Gravity, not just a good idea...it's the law!

Sportsbettingacumen.com: The science of sports betting
Go to Top of Page

JEROME DA GNOME
BANNED

2418 Posts

Posted - 08/27/2007 :  20:49:12   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send JEROME DA GNOME a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I am somewhat afraid to tell.

What a man believes upon grossly insufficient evidence is an index into his desires -- desires of which he himself is often unconscious. If a man is offered a fact which goes against his instincts, he will scrutinize it closely, and unless the evidence is overwhelming, he will refuse to believe it. If, on the other hand, he is offered something which affords a reason for acting in accordance to his instincts, he will accept it even on the slightest evidence. The origin of myths is explained in this way. - Bertrand Russell
Go to Top of Page

Penyprity
Skeptic Friend

64 Posts

Posted - 09/05/2007 :  09:20:46   [Permalink]  Show Profile Send Penyprity a Private Message  Reply with Quote
I would have voted 'other' if it would have let me. Frankly, I dont think about it at all.

Make your vote count. Become a supreme court justice......Peny
Go to Top of Page
Page: of 2 Previous Topic Topic Next Topic  
Previous Page
 New Topic  Reply to Topic
 Printer Friendly Bookmark this Topic BookMark Topic
Jump To:

The mission of the Skeptic Friends Network is to promote skepticism, critical thinking, science and logic as the best methods for evaluating all claims of fact, and we invite active participation by our members to create a skeptical community with a wide variety of viewpoints and expertise.


Home | Skeptic Forums | Skeptic Summary | The Kil Report | Creation/Evolution | Rationally Speaking | Skeptillaneous | About Skepticism | Fan Mail | Claims List | Calendar & Events | Skeptic Links | Book Reviews | Gift Shop | SFN on Facebook | Staff | Contact Us

Skeptic Friends Network
© 2008 Skeptic Friends Network Go To Top Of Page
This page was generated in 0.44 seconds.
Powered by @tomic Studio
Snitz Forums 2000