Back to Skeptic Summary
Skeptic Summary #328
By The Staff
Posted on: 5/1/2011
Confessions, releases, statements, conversions, women, parenting and more!
Week ending April 30, 2011 (Vol 8, #16)
Welcome to the Skeptic Summary, a quick week-in-review guide to the Skeptic Friends Network and the rest of the skeptical world.
Confessions of an ex-skeptic - Or rather, a cynic.
Obama released the long form - Will that make any difference to the Birthers?
Presidential facebook statement - Hints at Obama not being religious.
What would it take to convert/deconvert? - An act of God?
Editor’s Choice: Women skeptics - A not-so-simple question, it seems.
Kil’s Evil Pick:
Science-Based Parenting — With the almost sudden gaggle of babies popping out of family and friends (at least three over the course of the year), I thought I would give this site a shout out. The blog covers book reviews, the low-down on vaccinations, cell phones and children, raw milk and many other subjects that should be of interest to new and not-so-new parents.
Almost my favorite page, because it’s drop-dead funny is Junior Logical Fallacies. Here are a couple of examples:
Argument by Repetition — Any time a child wants something and asks for it repeatedly without regard to the fact that her father has said “NO” and stated his reason. This fallacy typically occurs when an ice-cream truck pulls into the cul-de-sac or when the family is at the toy store exit.And:
Argument by Whining — This is a fallacy that, left unchecked, will slowly melt your brain away. Although similar to the Vicious Circle of Persistent Questioning, this fallacy is differentiated by the elongation of diphthong vowels at the end of sentences. There’s typically a rise in annoying inflection, implying demand, but then a dip in tone, implying a need for sympathy. A parent can tune this fallacy out so that it sounds like the distant melodic gasps of a lone accordion.From their Who Are We? page:
We are not scientists. We are science-based skeptics.So there you go. A whole blog site dedicated to parenting future critical thinkers! I’m glad that I don’t have to do the parenting thing anymore, but I’m sorry that a site like Science-Based Parenting wasn’t available to me back there when I was.
A skeptic is one who prefers beliefs and conclusions that are reliable and valid to ones that are comforting or convenient, and therefore rigorously and openly applies the methods of science and reason to all empirical claims, especially their own. A skeptic provisionally proportions acceptance of any claim to valid logic and a fair and thorough assessment of available evidence, and studies the pitfalls of human reason and the mechanisms of deception so as to avoid being deceived by others or themselves. Skepticism values method over any particular conclusion. *
The purpose of this parenting site is to promote quality science and refute different types of speculative claims such as the supernatural, pseudoscience, alternative medicine, and any other extraordinary claim that contradicts facts established by science and/or reasoning.
We’re happy to have differing opinions here, so long as the language is mild and the arguments aren’t entirely ad hominems. We have opinions about various beliefs, and those opinions, by their very nature, might offend some people. That being said, we reserve the right to delete any nonconstructive comments from trolls.
Other than that, we welcome debate and discussion, and in the spirit of the blog, we’re happy to make corrections to any factual errors.
Contributing SFN writer Michelle Shires’ new baby, Maisie Rose.
Already a member!
The obscure we see eventually. The completely obvious, it seems, takes longer.
— Edward R. Murrow
Wednesday: Chat was unusually slow this week, but started out with playing the stock market, then evolved into a discussion about Trump and the released birth certificate. Some medicine got mentioned before the chat turned to the best rock songs through the ages, and why it’s hard to sing in tune.
Come chat with us.
New Members This Week:
(Not a member? Become one today!)
Elsewhere in the World:
ACCC drops the ball in faith healing case
Blood taken from John Paul to be used as relic
Budget cuts curtail search for alien life
China Plans Space Station By 2020
Darwin meets the citizen scientists
Fire ants assemble as a ‘super-organism’
A Skeptic In Oz
Skepticality #153 — The Science of Fat
Skepticism and Ethics Essay Contest
SpaceX aims to put man on Mars in 10-20 years
This Week in Intelligent Design
What’s New by Bob Park
Why Doctors Should Be More Empathetic — But Not Too Much More
With Friends Like These: Atheists Against the New Atheism
Got some skeptic news items? Send them to us, and we’ll think about adding them.
Book of the Week:
Revolutionary Deists: Early America’s Rational Infidels, by Kerry Walters.
“For some eighty-five years — between, roughly, 1725 and 1810 — the American colonies were agitated by what can only be described as a revolutionary movement. This was not the well-known political revolution that culminated in the War of Independence, but a revolution in religious and ethical thought. Its proponents called their radical viewpoint ‘deism.’ They challenged Christian orthodoxy and instead endorsed a belief system that celebrated the power of human reason and saw nature as God’s handiwork and the only revelation of divine will.
In this illuminating discussion of American deism, philosopher Kerry Walters presents an overview of the main tenets of deism, showing how its influence rose swiftly and for a time became a highly controversial subject of debate in the colonies.
The deists were students of the Enlightenment and took a keen interest in the scientific study of nature. They were thus critical of orthodox Christianity for its superstitious belief in miracles, persecution of dissent, and suppression of independent thought and expression.
At the heart of his book are profiles of six ‘rational infidels,’ most of whom are quite familiar to Americans as founding fathers or colonial patriots: Benjamin Franklin (the ambivalent deist), Thomas Jefferson (a critic of Christian supernaturalism but an admirer of its ethics), Ethan Allen (the rough-edged ‘frontier deist’), Thomas Paine (the arch iconoclast and author of The Age of Reason), Elihu Palmer (the tireless crusader for deism and perhaps its most influential proponent), and Philip Freneau (a poet whose popular verses combined deism with early romanticism). This is a fascinating study of America’s first culture war, one that in many ways has continued to this day.”
— Product Description
This Week’s Most-Viewed Pages:
- The Supper
- Moon-walker claims alien contact cover-up
- Funny FAILS
- Dr. Jeffery Life and Cenegenics
- Obama released the long form
- ETs are here, despite guesses to the contrary
- Webcam, bald eagle nest
- What would it take to convert/deconvert?
- Confessions of an ex-skeptic
- Bills planned to legalize abortion murders??
There were 7,361 daily visitors this week.
- Fundamentalists Hate Noah’s Ark
- Evolving a Venom or Two
- Miracle Thaw — The Bogus Miracle
- Scientific Truth
- Alternative Medicine and the Death of Candace Newmaker
- The Bible’s Bad Fruits
- Evolution is a Lie
- Is the Speed of Light Slowing Down?
- Skeptic Summary #327
- What is a Skeptic and Why Bother Being One?
More issues of the Skeptic Summary can be found in our archive.
The Skeptic Summary is produced by the staff of the Skeptic Friends Network, copyright 2011, all rights reserved.
Read or Add Comments about the Skeptic Summary